Yes and no there is evidance of superstishish humans. Just find some books.
there is no scientific evidence that vampires exist. therefore vampires cannot be dangerous if they do not exist.
No, because vampires do not exist; they are fictional characters.
Homo-nus Nocturnus is the Latin and Scientific name for a vampire.
No. The general scientific consensus is that vampires do not exist.
An organism is given a scientific name by its discoverer. As vampires are not scientifically recognized creatures and do not actually exist, they do not receive a name.
no but there is no proof that they aren't
While there are stories of vampires and vampire like creatures in the mythologies of most cultures, there is no scientific or other evidence that vampires have ever existed. So, no.
It is not a fact that vampires exist, but no, they don't have powers, they are the same as they were as a human, only they drink blood.
Its sharp teeth and claws
Evidense suggests about 8000 years ago
There is a common misconception that circumstantial evidense is not valid. This is not true. Circumstantial evidense can be very damaging especially when there is a lot of it. It's always nice to have physical/DNA evidense to go along with it, but in some cases it's not necessary. When there is a situation that has coincedense after coincedence the odds of them being random would be very slim. The point being, if it walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck the chances that it's a zebra is incredibly small.
There is no scientific proof that vampires or anything of the like exist. I do believe that if they do/did exist, they would enjoy video games as much as any other person.