No.
Yes, Thomas touching Jesus after his resurrection was significant because it provided physical proof of Jesus' resurrection, reinforcing Thomas' belief in his resurrection and divinity.
The empty tomb is the proof as well as easter.
no but there is no proof that they aren't
when the problem needs a scientific proof it becomes a scientific problem
To the faithful, yes, His resurrection is the ultimate proof upon which Chrisitanity rests. Romans 1:4 - and declared to be the Son of God with power according to the Spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead.To the unbeliever, of course, the resurrection story is only a fable.
The scientific or taxonomic name would be Lycoris squamigera.
There is no scientific proof of the yowie.
no there is not
Test; proof; experiment.
Proof.
There is no scientific proof that 'Nessie' exists.
it is a legend. their is no scientific proof of lepharchauns