No; it is not testable.
a valid investigation is an effective investigation i think. The results turn out to be what you had inferred.
Because good observations ensure accurate data and valid conclusions.
Statistically the results will not be scientifically valid if the sample size is too small.
The average person forms theories with little if any intellectual rigor or scientific investigation, hence, those theories are often not valid.
No, the scientific method can be uncontrolled to for it to be valid.
Check if the results are valid
a valid investigation is an effective investigation i think. The results turn out to be what you had inferred.
Because good observations ensure accurate data and valid conclusions.
Bias in a scientific investigation usually comes in the form of wanting a particular result. This can skew with the process, doing things that an objective experiment would never do, such as only choose certain results as valid.
Statistically the results will not be scientifically valid if the sample size is too small.
The average person forms theories with little if any intellectual rigor or scientific investigation, hence, those theories are often not valid.
No, the scientific method can be uncontrolled to for it to be valid.
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon that can be tested through research and experimentation. It serves as the basis for scientific investigation to determine if the proposed explanation is valid.
falsifiability. This principle suggests that for a scientific claim to be valid, it must be testable and potentially refutable through evidence and observation. By being able to be disproven, scientific claims can be rigorously tested and evaluated for accuracy.
Ghost hunting, ghost investigation, paranormal investigation are all valid terms.
when it is consistent with observation
Repeatable