It should be: 'Some athletes took drug tests to proove they were not on steroids'
"have taken" is correct
Some athletes have taken drug tests to prove they are not on steroids.
The first is almost correct. It should be, "Some athletes have taken drug tests to prove they are not on steroids." That is, "have taken" is the correct form, but it should also be "drug tests" rather than "drugs tests". "Have taken" is the correct form because "have" is the plural form, and "athletes" is plural. The singular form is "has taken", so it would be correct to say "One athlete has taken drug tests to prove he is not on steroids." Always use the past participle "taken" and not the simple past tense "took" in forms that use a form of the auxiliary verb "have": have taken, had taken, has taken, would have taken, and so on.
What is your question ????In this sentence take is an irregular verb
"Taken" is an irregular verb, "Take, took, taken." If it were regular it would be "Take, taked, taked".
Taken is an irregular verb. Taken is the past participle of the verb 'take'. If the verb was regular, then the past tense of 'take' would be 'taked' whereas instead it's took and taken.
Is this a correct sentence? To prove it once agin and to bliss you we now have a special offer
It is important to prove that a geometric shape is the correct locus for a given set of conditions.
This sentence contains a shift in person, as it switches from the third-person perspective ("one writes") to the second-person perspective ("he will prove"). Maintaining consistency in person throughout a sentence is essential for clear and effective communication.
Real small
That is the correct spelling of the verb "prove" (establish as fact).
Yes, they are. So they can have a chance to prove themselves not guilty!