Yes, because the past tense is not formed by adding -ed - throwed .
The past is threw
Yes, "throw" is an irregular verb in English. Its past simple form is "threw" and its past participle form is "thrown."
Yes there is. Threw is the past form of the irregular verb throw.
The past tense of the verb "throw" is "threw." It is a irregular variation of the base form of the verb.
Threw is the simple past tense of throw.
Throw is an irregular verb. Throwed is not the past tense. Threw is the past tense.
"Have" is an irregular verb in English.
It's irregular.
It's an irregular verb.
No, it does not have to be. All it means when you have an "irregular" verb is that this verb forms its tenses in an unusual way. For example, in regular verbs, the past tense is formed by adding an -ed. Today, I walk. Yesterday, I walked. Another example of a regular verb: to wait. Today, I wait. Yesterday (or last week, last year, whatever) I waited. But the verb "sing" is irregular. Today, I sing. But... yesterday, I sang. Or, another example: the verb "throw" is irregular. Today, I throw the ball. Yesterday, I threw the ball. Thus, while there are some non-action verbs ("to be," for example) that are irregular, there are also plenty of action verbs that are also irregular, usually because of how their past tense or past participle is formed.
irregular verb irregular verb
It's an irregular verb.
Ate is an irregular verb.