It really depends on your altitude and landscape. Barren, flat yards can function with either above or underground irrigation systems. Arid landscapes with little humidity will often produce better results using underground irrigation because you are adding essential elements from the "ground up",allowing the seeds or new growth to take what is required and leave damp reserves. Rolling hills or other uneven landscaping will fare just as well with above ground irrigation. Likewise, multiple species or plant types will likely thrive with above ground watering.
ac
machines being invented made farming more effecient
Not necessarily but usually
The Mesopotamia vreated irrigation systems because with irrigation people of mesopotamia were able to grow more food.
No, they all shoot out water just as effective as the next.
Same as a modern one. Thay are no more energy effecient.
The enzyme function would not be as effecient, causing the liver to produce more enzymes.
It sprays water over the top of the plants, similar to a gentle shower. Not as efficient as drip irrigation, but much more efficient than flood or furrow irrigation.
Large irrigation channels losses more water by evaporation.
It sprays water over the top of the plants, similar to a gentle shower. Not as efficient as drip irrigation, but much more efficient than flood or furrow irrigation.
i myself have ADD and i find Ritalin extremely not usable as a medicine instead use concerta it's way more effecient.
irrigation allowed farming in more places and increased crop yields ,but it strained water supplies.