Not completely necessary. If it was the world would be full ove civil wars every day. The reason it is not is because people are able to talk things over. Think of it this way: Have you ever got in a fight with your friends? Have you ever disagreed about something with your friends? You most likely have. Well you didn't go to war with your friends did you? No, you talked it over. If war was necessary to solve problems you would have went to war with them.
If it is something bigger like countries disagreeing they can still talk it over.
When it is something like what happend to the US on 9/11 then it is somewhat necessary to go to war.
War keeps the world from over populating.
they never did. They lost the war.
extreme war debt
Anne Frank did not solve any specific problems. She is known for writing a diary during World War II while hiding from the Nazis, which provided a unique perspective on the Holocaust. Her diary has since educated generations about the horrors of war and discrimination.
it ended the war quickly, at low cost in terms of both money and lives lost on both sides.
something
i think that politics cause problems but also solve it.take a war for example.when they are all argueing about what to do , people are dying out there.the immediate action is to ,stop the war, NT talk.however , the talk actually manage to allow the fellow organisations to act togerther and solve problems more effectively, thus sloving problems.
Yes. Personally, I believe that war is stupid. I mean why cant nations solve problems by playing a game of chess, or even basic communication! War shouldnt be the answer.
cause other countries can't just talk it over and solve their problems
money problems
the native Americans used it to solve problems instead of war.
He helped negotiated with the Russo-Japanese War.