No because anyone can answer these questions and they might be lying.
Wiki isn't a credible source, because, it doesn't really give off correct information.
After reading WIKI, I have no idea. He is less credible than before I read about him.
Its considered a Non credible website because anyone can answer the questions you asked and might give you the wrong answer
C. An online encyclopedia article or wiki
not credible!
I am a Professor of Medicine at Harvard University, and my students have been using Wikipedia for years. It is a very credible and good source. Not to mention but that its a great and a reliable source.
Many schools discourage the use of Wikipedia in research because it can be edited by anyone but you could use the parts that have credible resources.
That is the correct spelling of "credible" (believable).
more credible, most credible
Wiki was originally started in Portland ,Oregon in 1994. Although wikis is not always credible, it it used for multipule purposes such as research, note taking, and information management.
Facebook is both, a credible site + an non credible site
Wiki is not a reliable source for accurate information because it can be edited by anyone, leading to potential inaccuracies or bias. It's always best to cross-reference information from multiple credible sources to ensure accuracy and reliability.