No, it is not a conjunction. Zoo is a noun, and may be used as an adjunct or adjective (e.g. zoo keeper).
The correct and commonly accepted phrase is “in conjunction with.” “In conjunction to” is generally considered incorrect in standard English.
The London Zoo has a koala exhibit, and they have been actively and productively engaged, in conjunction with a number of Australian organisations, in an artificial insemination program.Many major zoos around the world will have a koala exhibit providing that they can produce a suitable koala habitat.
Yes, it is a subordinating conjunction. It connects a restrictive clause.
No, "wow" is not a conjunction. It's an interjection.
It is a conjunction.
There is no conjunction of will not.Maybe you mean contraction.If you do then won't is the contraction
The word are is not a conjunction. It is a verb.
No, it is not a conjunction. The word be is a verb.
no better is not a conjunction
The answer will depend on which zoo!The answer will depend on which zoo!The answer will depend on which zoo!The answer will depend on which zoo!
It can be a conjunction, as well as an adverb. As a subordinating conjunction, it connects restrictive dependent clauses.
No, it is not a conjunction. It is a contraction. It combines the pronoun YOU and the verb ARE.