yes
Reproduction is better for animals in the wild than in the zoo because in the wild,if an animal reproduces, the offspring grow up and learn to live in the wild naturally. If an animal reproduces in the zoo, the offspring would have to be taught to live in the wild or never be let free back into its natural habitat.
yes because they are well trained then wild life animals
Zoo york is way better than blind Zoo york is way better than blind
animals live longer in the zoo then the wild because there is a steadier food balance in a zoo than in the wild there is also not any predators in the zoo in the cage they are in.
A safari park is far better than a zoo because there are no cages and visitors get the see the animals behave like they would in their natural habitat.
No, The San Diego Zoo is bigger than the San Antonio Zoo.
The Element is better in quality, but the Zoo York brand looks better.
if you think zero is better than zoo york you know nothing about tech decks
They may be chosen for that reason, but on average the zoo giraffes are typical sizes.
In some ways, yes, the Santa Barbara Zoo is better than the LA Zoo. For example, the Santa Barbara zoo has more species of animals available for viewing, and they charge less of a an entrance fee.
animals in zoos lifes are cut by about 20% from ones in the wild
The cheetah lives in both the wild and the zoo