It is inaccurate to define nonfiction as writing that is true or real because nonfiction is not necessarily "true" or "real." Non-fiction is instead defined as something that is an account or representation of a subject which is presented as fact. Thus this presentation may be accurate or inaccurate, and it can give either a true or false account of the subject at hand.
More importantly, though, in nonfiction it is generally assumed that the authors of such accounts believe them to be truthful at the time of their composition. Memoirs for instance, are the memories of the subject and while we assume them to be true, memory is a very tricky thing so instead of them being "true" by the definition of true as we know it; it is true as best as the author can remember it.
The true crime genre is an example. The author cannot know what the victims of a massacre were thinking before it happened, or every move these people made before they were all killed, so it is appropriate for the author to create these details in an effort to complete the narration. As long as the details that can be verified are true, then it is still nonfiction. To reiterate: nonfiction is not writing that is true or real but instead is writing that we perceive to be true or real and has a basis in fact.
One traditional but inaccurate idea about nonfiction writing is that it consists solely of objective facts and information, devoid of the author's voice or interpretation. In reality, nonfiction writing often involves the author's perspective, bias, and storytelling techniques, which can influence how information is presented to the reader. This misconception can oversimplify the complexity and artistry of nonfiction writing.
What's "true" or "real" varies depending on your perspective.
It is inaccurate to define nonfiction as writing that's true or real because what's "true" or "real" varies depending on your perspective.
A traditional and perhaps inaccurate idea is that all nonfiction writing is completely factual and objective. In reality, nonfiction can be influenced by the author's perspective, bias, and subjective interpretation of events, leading to potential inaccuracies or misleading information.
Writing that is a product of a writer's imagination, and an invention instead of actual fact or history
Perhaps your original question was a little ambiguous, or inaccurate. If your question is unclear - it may be hard to get an accurate answer.
Perhaps you mean Haggis - a traditional ceremonial meal from Scotland.
It could skip numbers, such as if you are counting by 3's (3,6,9,12,15) then it could have wrong numbers, and there could also be other misleading stuff too. +++ It could be misleading if the values themselves are incorrect, or if the line is a best-fit trace drawn erroneously, perhaps on a graph of points that genuinely do not really follow a discreet numerical law.
Perhaps that's because it's a traditional greeting
Most traditional would have to be a candy corn or a witch, perhaps a mummy. It can also be a vampire or ghost. My favorite traditional Halloween costume is a candy corn witch.
Perhaps the history of a roller coaster, or something that interests you. Studies show that students that can relate to their work are more likely to"ACE" the assignment.
Traditional rulers are made of wood, perhaps sticks, and generally only show one length, which is the full length of the ruler. There are no markings for secondary measurements.
Stereotypically, their Missus' sandwich. If Welsh, perhaps the traditional pastie (meat, vegetable, and dessert pie in one neat crust). If German, perhaps "ein brat und ein bier.
Flamenco is a form of Spanish dancing that involves complex footwork... perhaps the "stomping" you were referring to....
Graphs can mislead people by the way they are prepared. See related links for good examples of misleading graphs. When you see a graph, you are seeing a summary of the data. Sometimes our data is misleading, so the graph is just presenting misleading data. For example, I show a graph of how much men and women make each year at a company. I see men make more every year, while women just stay about the same. Perhaps the company just has one woman working there. Perhaps in her job, there are no salary increases. I can also not start the y-axis at zero, to exagerrate the differences. A chart should include all the data. Excluding some data can result in a misleading graph. However, in a graph showing changes over period of time, the preparer of the graph has to chose how long a period is relavent. If we are explaining global warming, a plot showing 100 years might be good. But a graph of car accidents per year, perhaps 5 years is more reasonable.