Since the statements are not provided, please list them so I can identify which one john Locke would not have agreed with.
John Locke would likely have agreed with statements promoting individual rights, the idea of a social contract between government and citizens, and the belief that government exists to protect people's natural rights to life, liberty, and property.
John Locke would most likely have agreed with the statement that individuals have natural rights that governments should protect, such as life, liberty, and property. Locke believed in the social contract theory, where people agree to establish a government to protect their natural rights.
John Locke would most likely have agreed with the idea of natural rights, the importance of individual liberty, and the concept of limited government.
"Thomas Hobbes believed that people are inherently good and can be trusted, while John Locke believed in the concept of the social contract and the idea of natural rights." This statement is incorrect because it switches the beliefs of Hobbes and Locke. Hobbes actually believed in the inherent selfishness and competitiveness of human nature, while Locke emphasized the importance of natural rights and the consent of the governed in a social contract.
Thomas Hobbes believed that humans are inherently selfish and driven by self-preservation, while John Locke believed that humans are born as blank slates, with knowledge and ideas acquired through experience. The statement that is not correct is: "John Locke supported absolute monarchy as the best form of government." Locke actually advocated for a constitutional government based on the consent of the governed rather than absolute monarchy.
jean jacque rousseau
John Locke would likely have agreed with statements promoting individual rights, the idea of a social contract between government and citizens, and the belief that government exists to protect people's natural rights to life, liberty, and property.
John Locke would most likely have agreed with the statement that individuals have natural rights that governments should protect, such as life, liberty, and property. Locke believed in the social contract theory, where people agree to establish a government to protect their natural rights.
"Thomas Hobbes believed that people are inherently good and can be trusted, while John Locke believed in the concept of the social contract and the idea of natural rights." This statement is incorrect because it switches the beliefs of Hobbes and Locke. Hobbes actually believed in the inherent selfishness and competitiveness of human nature, while Locke emphasized the importance of natural rights and the consent of the governed in a social contract.
Jefferson did. He expressed Locke's philosophy in the Declaration of Independence.
I think you have it backwards, but that the United States democracy is based on the philosophy of Locke so the constitution agreed with Locke.
Jefferson did. He expressed Locke's philosophy in the Declaration of Independence.
Thomas Hobbes believed that humans are inherently selfish and driven by self-preservation, while John Locke believed that humans are born as blank slates, with knowledge and ideas acquired through experience. The statement that is not correct is: "John Locke supported absolute monarchy as the best form of government." Locke actually advocated for a constitutional government based on the consent of the governed rather than absolute monarchy.
They agreed on Natural Rights (life liberty and the pursuit of happiness)
They had a pice of paper and agreed and argue alot
John Locke would most likely have agreed with the idea of natural rights, the importance of individual liberty, and the concept of limited government.
Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness-- cribbed almost directly from Locke's conception of Life, Liberty, and Property.