EXCLUSIVE
Exclusive federal jurisdiction refers to cases that can only be heard in federal courts, such as those involving federal laws, treaties, or the Constitution. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when both federal and state courts have the authority to hear a particular case, allowing plaintiffs to choose between them. This often applies to cases involving federal questions or diversity of citizenship, where parties are from different states. In such situations, the legal issues can be addressed in either court system, depending on the circumstances.
The jurisdiction of DC NISI courts refers to their authority to hear and decide on specific legal matters within their designated geographical area. These courts have limited authority to handle certain types of cases, usually civil matters that do not involve criminal charges, and their decisions are typically provisional or subject to change.
Exclusive jurisdiction refers to the power of a specific court or legal authority to hear and decide a particular type of case, to the exclusion of all other courts. This means that only that designated court has the authority to adjudicate certain matters, preventing other courts from taking jurisdiction over those cases. Exclusive jurisdiction is often established by statutes or constitutional provisions and can apply to various legal areas, such as federal versus state matters.
Federal subject matter jurisdiction refers to the authority of federal courts to hear cases based on the nature of the issues involved. It primarily encompasses two categories: cases arising under federal laws or the Constitution (federal question jurisdiction) and cases where the parties are from different states and the amount in controversy exceeds a specified threshold (diversity jurisdiction). This jurisdiction ensures that certain legal matters are handled at the federal level, promoting uniformity and consistency in the application of federal laws.
It generally refers to the areas in which a specific court has jurisdiction, sometimes pertaining to geographical (territorial) location and/or legal jurisdiction. The jurisdiction of every court is determined by the statute or constitution that created the court. Jurisdiction can be federal or state or a choice between the two, depending upon the legal issues involved.
In the federal Judicial Branch, the intermediate appellate courts are the thirteen US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts. The states use different naming conventions for their intermediate appellate courts.
There is a concept called "jurisdiction", which refers to the power and authority of a court to hear and decide both civil and criminal matters. The identity of a court having jurisdiction will depend upon many factors. These include, depending upon the nature of the case, the amount of money in dispute, the nature of the dispute (for example, all family law cases are generally within one court's jurisdiction irrespective of the existence of children or length of marriage), or the severity of the crime or infraction charged (felony, misdemeanor, or noncriminal infraction such as many traffic tickets). Different states have different names for the various "levels" of court that may have jurisdiction over a given type of case. Likewise, the names will be different if the state court system or the federal court system is implicated. Therefore, at the least, you will have to know the identity of the state involved.
Exclusive jurisdiction refers to the legal authority of a specific court or tribunal to hear and decide a particular type of case, excluding the jurisdiction of all other courts. This means that only the designated court has the power to adjudicate the matter, preventing other courts from intervening. Exclusive jurisdiction often applies to specialized areas of law, such as bankruptcy or immigration, ensuring that cases are handled by judges with expertise in those fields.
Jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court to hear and decide cases. Cases typically fall under jurisdiction based on factors such as the geographical location of the parties involved, the subject matter of the dispute, and the parties' consent. Common categories include civil cases (like contracts and torts), criminal cases (involving violations of law), and administrative cases (involving government agencies). Additionally, federal courts have jurisdiction over cases involving federal law or disputes between states.
If a federal court only has appellate jurisdiction it can only hear appeals of cases that have been tried in lower federal courts and can't conduct its own trials.For example, the US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts have only appellate jurisdiction, primarily over cases tried in the 94 US District Courts.The Supreme Court of the United States is a federal court with appellate jurisdiction; however, it also exercises original jurisdiction over disputes between the states. The Supreme Court may review appeals from both federal and state courts, as long as the appeal contains a (preserved) federal question. This means the case must involve federal law, US treaties, or US Constitutional issues.
"Arising under" refers to a legal concept used to determine whether a case falls within the jurisdiction of federal courts. Specifically, it pertains to cases that involve federal law or constitutional issues, meaning the cause of action originates from federal statutes or treaties. This concept is crucial in establishing whether federal courts have the authority to hear a case, as opposed to state courts. Essentially, if a claim is based on federal law, it is considered to "arise under" that law.
Hierarchical jurisdiction refers to differences in court functions and court responsibilities with regard to specific cases •Two types: original and appellate - If a court has original jurisdiction then that court has the authority to try a case and decide it (the origin of the case) - If a court has appellate jurisdiction then that court has the authority to review cases which have already been reviewed by other courts