No. Kush is located in the southern part of modern Egypt and the northern part of modern Sudan.
The statement is false . Part of Kush was located in what is currently known as southern Egypt. It was also located in what is now Sudan.
Three of those statements are true: (2) Kush controlled all of Egypt at one point - 25th Pharaonic Dynasty AND (4) Rome invaded Kush (unsuccessfully) - Rome tried to conquer Kush around 22 B.C.E. and had Petronius lead the attack. However, the Kushites were able to defeat this invasion and established peaceful relations with Rome afterward AND (5) Kush was conquered by Aksum. (1), and (3) are false. Since the Aksumites conquered Kush, it could not have been the Greeks. Since Kush was in Sudan and Egypt, it was not in Saudi Arabia.
near the Nile river in Egypt
Kush is a "city " located at the south of Egypt.
The Hindu Kush mountains are located on the head of Afghanistan and Pakistan
hh
Kush was located in Africa, specifically in the region of Nubia which is in present-day Sudan.
The Hindu Kush is a mountain range located in central Asia.
In relation to Egypt, Kush was located to the south, along the Nile River. ily <3
It is true that Kush was invaded by Rome,
no it was located in Africa
The land of Nubia was were the Kingdom of Kush was located. In what is now northern Sudan.