difference between conventional costing methodology ang activity costing
Traditional costing system allocates the idle capacity cost to completed units while activity based costing only allocates the cost of capacity which is utilized while remaining capacity is expensed to income statement as period cost.
Absorption costing income statement is that statement in which overheads are charged to units of products based on predetermined blanket rate.
It is old costing technique & it is replaced by activity based costing
False. Activity-based costing is used to allocate indirect cost into direct costs.Regardng direct cost, traditional costing is as appropriate as activity-based costing.
activity based costing does not promote TQM(total quality management) and continuous improvement but attribute based costing promotes the both.
Answering "Problem relating to the implementation of activity based costing and activity based management system
There are two methods of preparing Income Statement. They are:- 1. Absorption costing method. 2. variable Costing method.
In traditional costing, overheads are allocated using blanket rate while in activity based costing overheads are allocated by the activities performed.
Activity based costing has primary difference of allocation of overheads which are based on activities performed by any department while in traditional costing system overheads are allocated on predetermined rate which may be not very accurate.
Activity-based costing is a form of cost refinement, designed to obtain greater accuracy than traditional allocations in cost assignments for product costing and decision-making purposes.
Hi Activity Based Costing could be seen as the 'Cause-and-Effect' realtionship in the costs. If we extend this logic then we can segregate all the costs in four sections. a) Product Costs b) Customer Costs c) Business Sustaining Costs d) Cost available to use In this sense the Activity Basedd Costing gives an accurate costing picture.