Wow brian good job haha.
in the remilitrizasion of the rhineland, the anschluss of austria, the annextion of the sudetenland, and the complete conquest of czeckoslovakia
they let Hitler make an army, they let Germany make a transportation system for troops, allowed Germany to join austria and they let Hitler anex other countrys
Winston Churchill opposed Neville Chamberlain's policy of appeasement because he saw and new what Hitler was doing and new that he was getting stronger, he stood up and said this but was the only one who did so...He didint say appeasement was a bad idea he just thought after Hitler had broken his promises a couple of times he thought that they should have stopped and used aggression and stopped Hitler while they could.
There are many reasons which do justify appeasement and also many reasons that don't justify appeasement. Firstly, appeasement was justified because many military experts in Britain calculated that there would be over 1 million deaths in the first 60 days of war if war broke out in September 1938. This meant that many people wanted to have a negotiated peace because Britain was not ready for war. Furthermore, appeasement was justified because Britain wanted to play for time so she could rearm and massively increase the number of men in the army (through conscription) and the number of RAF planes. This also links to the calculations made by the military experts as Britain knew that if they did not rearm then many civilians would die in air raids. Instead, politicians knew that buying time would decrease that risk. However, appeasement was not justified because only 7% of the British population believed that Hitler would not demand to take over any other European countries. This meant that 93% of the population thought Hitler would take land that was not rightfully German which would inevitably result in war. Furthermore, appeasement was not justified because giving in to Hitler's demands at the Munich Conference meant that Hitler would have more confidence and perhaps take a gamble to demand more land in the future. This also links to the fact that Germany would become much stronger through appeasement which would make it much harder to defeat a stronger Germany in the future. In my overall opinion, I don't think appeasement was justified because it gave Hitler the confidence to demand more land. This was evident when Hitler demanded the Polish Corridor and Danzig in August 1939, which eventually resulted in war. The public opinion in Britain also was a reason to abandon appeasement because many thought Hitler would demand further, which did happen, and this links to the point I said about Hitler growing more confident and stronger. However, the possible death toll in the first 60 days of a war was incredibly high if Britain did not play for time and rearm.
The allies were winning in 1917
Hitler was in jail only once.
Hitler was married 3 times. including Eva Braun before he killed himself.
Many times over.
The U.S. was part of the Allies during WWII.
Exactly 42 times.
What or who do you classify first as allies? England France, United States Russia,(at Times)
In 1933, Germany completely stopped paying reparations, and began to rearm. In 1934, they began to build their air force -- the Luftwaffe. In 1935, conscription was reintroduced in Germany, and the armed forces increased to five times the size it was before. The re-militarisation of the Rhineland happened in 1936, which was a major breach of the treaty. The Allies didn't do anything about these breaches of the treaty because they were following a policy of appeasement, and giving in to his demands in the hope that he wouldn't start a war.