0
Lord Macartney compromised with the Chinese by offering the same respect as he gave his own King, George III, the Chinese accepted that offer, and historians should accept that compromise in the spirit in which it was offered and accepted. This question by its phrasing implies that Lord Macartney should have forgotten who he represented, that is, King George III, and treated Emperor Qian-long according to China's limited idea (at the time) of its position in the world. King George III had a different idea of the potential relationship between Great Britain and China from that of Emperor Qian-long.
What else can I help you with?
Why did Emperor Qianlong reject Macartney's trade in 1793?
Emperor Qianlong rejected Lord Macartney's trade proposal in 1793 primarily because he viewed China as self-sufficient and believed it had little need for British goods. Qianlong's response reflected a sense of cultural superiority and the belief that foreign nations should acknowledge China's dominance. Additionally, Macartney's refusal to perform the traditional kowtow ritual further strained negotiations, reinforcing the emperor's decision to deny the request for expanded trade.
What is one way that Emperor Qian Long responds to King George III's envoy?
Emperor Qianlong responded to King George III's envoy, Lord Macartney, by emphasizing China's self-sufficiency and superiority. He dismissed the idea of expanding trade and made it clear that China had little interest in British goods, as they were content with their own resources and culture. Qianlong's letter to George III outlined his view that the British should show respect for China's established order and hierarchy rather than seek to alter it. This response highlighted the cultural and political differences between the two empires.
Should Lord macartney should have kowtowed to emperor qian-long?
Lord Macartney compromised with the Chinese by offering the same respect as he gave his own King, George III, the Chinese accepted that offer, and historians should accept that compromise in the spirit in which it was offered and accepted. This question by its phrasing implies that Lord Macartney should have forgotten who he represented, that is, King George III, and treated Emperor Qian-long according to China's limited idea (at the time) of its position in the world. King George III had a different idea of the potential relationship between Great Britain and China from that of Emperor Qian-long.
Lord George Macartney should have kowtowed to Emperor Qian-long?
Lord Macartney compromised with the Chinese by offering the same respect as he gave his own King, George III, the Chinese accepted that offer, and historians should accept that compromise in the spirit in which it was offered and accepted. This question by its phrasing implies that Lord Macartney should have forgotten who he represented, that is, King George III, and treated Emperor Qian-long according to China's limited idea (at the time) of its position in the world. King George III had a different idea of the potential relationship between Great Britain and China from that of Emperor Qian-long.
When qian long expected lord George Macartney to kowtow what do you think Macartney should have done?
Lord Macartney compromised with the Chinese by offering the same respect as he gave his own King, George III, the Chinese accepted that offer, and historians should accept that compromise in the spirit in which it was offered and accepted. This question by its phrasing implies that Lord Macartney should have forgotten who he represented, that is, King George III, and treated Emperor Qian-long according to China's limited idea (at the time) of its position in the world. King George III had a different idea of the potential relationship between Great Britain and China from that of Emperor Qian-long.
Lord george macartney should have kowtowed to emperors qian-long?
Lord Macartney compromised with the Chinese by offering the same respect as he gave his own King, George III, the Chinese accepted that offer, and historians should accept that compromise in the spirit in which it was offered and accepted. This question by its phrasing implies that Lord Macartney should have forgotten who he represented, that is, King George III, and treated Emperor Qian-long according to China's limited idea (at the time) of its position in the world. King George III had a different idea of the potential relationship between Great Britain and China from that of Emperor Qian-long.
In the late 18th century the king of England sent representatives to China in hopes of opening it to increased trade. best describes the Qing emperor Qianlong's response to the king's request?
Emperor Qianlong's response to the British king's request for increased trade was dismissive and rooted in the belief of China's cultural superiority. He viewed the British proposal as unnecessary, asserting that China had no need for foreign goods and that trade should be conducted on China's terms. The emperor's letter emphasized that China was self-sufficient and did not require Western influence or products, reinforcing the isolationist policies of the Qing dynasty.
Which Beatle sang What if your Mother Should Know?
Paul Macartney sang your mother should know
Should emperor be capitalized?
No, because it is n ot a proper n ou n.
Byzantines believed that their emperor?
Byzantines believed that their emperor should represented Jesus Christ on Earth.
Why did Pliny write to Emperor Trajan?
he wrote about wanting to have a baby with the emperor
Which emperor willed on his life that the Roman empire should be split into two parts?
No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.
