answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Huxley-an would argue that if anything spiritual or transcendent existed, we could never know it. A modern rationalist would argue that if anything spiritual or transcendent did exist, it would be just as amenable to human understanding and knowledge as everything else.

Huxley's position was that there could exist things that man cannot, in principle, ever know of. The modern rationalist position is that man is, in principle, capable of knowing anything that is true -- nothing fundamental limits man's ability to detect and comprehend all things that exist.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Might Huxley-an agnosticism the same as modern rationalism?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Who is the founder of atheism?

No one founder of agnosticism has existed. The word is a variant of agnosis, which simply means "not knowing," and people use it in reference to their belief that a person cannot truly know whether or not a god does or does not, or gods do or do not, exist. That is strong agnosticism. Weak agnosticism is an individual's being undecided.If it can be said that there was a main proponent of agnosticism, then that proponent was one of Charles Darwin's staunchest defenders, Thomas Henry Huxley. He noted that others had too-strong beliefs--he called them gnostics--whilst he was still searching. For him, agnosticism was an epistemological method, one that might have been equated with rationalism, and thus did not conflict with his being an atheist in metaphysics.Hence, it is possible for a person to be both a strong agnostic and an atheist. Rationalists declare their argumentation defensible and maintain that agnosticism applies. But some of these consider strong agnosticism wrong in that the arguments against God and the arguments for naturalism succeed. It is therefore a matter of judgment. Graham Robert Oppy, in Arguing About Gods,expresses the fallibilist attitude and explains weak agnosticism.


What are some of the Administrative rationalism examples?

Administrative rationalism is a discourse that exists between State and Industry and Community. The state acts as if it has the knowlegde to fix the problems that exist with in industry or the community. This might be through the creation of laws or setting of standards or regulations on certain activities or emissions. The creation of agencies to administer these laws such as the Environmental Protection Agency are an example of administrative rationalism. The agency is set up to act as the main knowledge base on the environment. The piece meal dealing with different parts of the environment such as, air, water, land use, endangered species and pesticides is an attempt of adminstrative rationalism to manage parts of the environment.


What was the first invention that might be called modern?

The magnetic compass was the first invention that might be called modern.


Why might hogarths painting be difficult for modern audiences to understand?

William Hogarth's painting might be difficult for modern audiences to understand because the paintings attacked contemporary taste which modern audiences hold today.


A modern day diviner might be called a?

Seer psychic


What might you consider a modern-day form of the traditional diary?

blogs


Modern farming practices speed up the decomposition of matter in soil how might this affect the nitrogen cycle?

how might a modern farming speeding up the decomposition of matter in soil affect the nitrogen cycle


Who might be today's modern-day Charles Foster Kane?

Perhaps Rupert Murdock might be similar to Foster Kane.


What are modernism stories?

I think it might be literature based on the modern, technologied world.


What modern American values might be familiar to a 17th century Puritan?

a ghost


What modern American values might be familiar to 17th century puritan?

a ghost


What are the disadvantages of modern agriculture?

The disadvantage of modern agriculture is that if pesticides are not used correctly they might become toxic to plants, animal and the environment it self.