The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions militarily. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
No, they didn't have to. Roman citizens were all free. Rome fought for the glory of Rome and for the honors associated with military victories.No, they didn't have to. Roman citizens were all free. Rome fought for the glory of Rome and for the honors associated with military victories.No, they didn't have to. Roman citizens were all free. Rome fought for the glory of Rome and for the honors associated with military victories.No, they didn't have to. Roman citizens were all free. Rome fought for the glory of Rome and for the honors associated with military victories.No, they didn't have to. Roman citizens were all free. Rome fought for the glory of Rome and for the honors associated with military victories.No, they didn't have to. Roman citizens were all free. Rome fought for the glory of Rome and for the honors associated with military victories.No, they didn't have to. Roman citizens were all free. Rome fought for the glory of Rome and for the honors associated with military victories.No, they didn't have to. Roman citizens were all free. Rome fought for the glory of Rome and for the honors associated with military victories.No, they didn't have to. Roman citizens were all free. Rome fought for the glory of Rome and for the honors associated with military victories.
A location does not have a strong military. Rome developed of a strong military for historical reasons.
You need to specify whose fall you are referring to.
The fall of Rome. Rome had provided all the protection and services a society needed and when it was gone there was chaos.
Rome became master of the Mediterranean by military conquest. By winning the Punic wars, Rome neutralized Carthage, which was Rome's only serious competition.Rome became master of the Mediterranean by military conquest. By winning the Punic wars, Rome neutralized Carthage, which was Rome's only serious competition.Rome became master of the Mediterranean by military conquest. By winning the Punic wars, Rome neutralized Carthage, which was Rome's only serious competition.Rome became master of the Mediterranean by military conquest. By winning the Punic wars, Rome neutralized Carthage, which was Rome's only serious competition.Rome became master of the Mediterranean by military conquest. By winning the Punic wars, Rome neutralized Carthage, which was Rome's only serious competition.Rome became master of the Mediterranean by military conquest. By winning the Punic wars, Rome neutralized Carthage, which was Rome's only serious competition.Rome became master of the Mediterranean by military conquest. By winning the Punic wars, Rome neutralized Carthage, which was Rome's only serious competition.Rome became master of the Mediterranean by military conquest. By winning the Punic wars, Rome neutralized Carthage, which was Rome's only serious competition.Rome became master of the Mediterranean by military conquest. By winning the Punic wars, Rome neutralized Carthage, which was Rome's only serious competition.
Montesquieu postulated that Rome's military might outweighed its dedication to civic responsibility and the costs of expansion undermined the Empire.
There are adherents to single factors, but more people think Rome fell because of a combination of such factors as Christianity, decadence, and military problems. Even the rise of Islam is proposed as the reason for Rome's fall, by some who think the Fall of Rome happened at Constantinople in the 15th Century. Here I am writing about a roughly fifth century fall of Rome (or the western division of the Roman Empire).
There was no solution, which is why Rome did in fact fall.
The period after the fall of Rome in the west is called the Dark Ages.The period after the fall of Rome in the west is called the Dark Ages.The period after the fall of Rome in the west is called the Dark Ages.The period after the fall of Rome in the west is called the Dark Ages.The period after the fall of Rome in the west is called the Dark Ages.The period after the fall of Rome in the west is called the Dark Ages.The period after the fall of Rome in the west is called the Dark Ages.The period after the fall of Rome in the west is called the Dark Ages.The period after the fall of Rome in the west is called the Dark Ages.
The time after the fall of Rome in the west is often called the Dark Ages.The time after the fall of Rome in the west is often called the Dark Ages.The time after the fall of Rome in the west is often called the Dark Ages.The time after the fall of Rome in the west is often called the Dark Ages.The time after the fall of Rome in the west is often called the Dark Ages.The time after the fall of Rome in the west is often called the Dark Ages.The time after the fall of Rome in the west is often called the Dark Ages.The time after the fall of Rome in the west is often called the Dark Ages.The time after the fall of Rome in the west is often called the Dark Ages.
The causes of the fall of ancient Rome are numerous and complex. These causes can be summed up by saying the fall was caused by pressures on the borders and decay from within.The causes of the fall of ancient Rome are numerous and complex. These causes can be summed up by saying the fall was caused by pressures on the borders and decay from within.The causes of the fall of ancient Rome are numerous and complex. These causes can be summed up by saying the fall was caused by pressures on the borders and decay from within.The causes of the fall of ancient Rome are numerous and complex. These causes can be summed up by saying the fall was caused by pressures on the borders and decay from within.The causes of the fall of ancient Rome are numerous and complex. These causes can be summed up by saying the fall was caused by pressures on the borders and decay from within.The causes of the fall of ancient Rome are numerous and complex. These causes can be summed up by saying the fall was caused by pressures on the borders and decay from within.The causes of the fall of ancient Rome are numerous and complex. These causes can be summed up by saying the fall was caused by pressures on the borders and decay from within.The causes of the fall of ancient Rome are numerous and complex. These causes can be summed up by saying the fall was caused by pressures on the borders and decay from within.The causes of the fall of ancient Rome are numerous and complex. These causes can be summed up by saying the fall was caused by pressures on the borders and decay from within.
A location does not have a strong military. Rome developed of a strong military for historical reasons.
No. Rome fell because it's swollen beurocracy fell to infighting between groups, and allowed the northern tribes to succeed in resisting Roman rule.
Here's a hint. Rome fell in 476 AD. For the remaining answer to your question, read your book. You homework answers have to come from you, not an outside source.
No, they didn't have to. Roman citizens were all free. Rome fought for the glory of Rome and for the honors associated with military victories.No, they didn't have to. Roman citizens were all free. Rome fought for the glory of Rome and for the honors associated with military victories.No, they didn't have to. Roman citizens were all free. Rome fought for the glory of Rome and for the honors associated with military victories.No, they didn't have to. Roman citizens were all free. Rome fought for the glory of Rome and for the honors associated with military victories.No, they didn't have to. Roman citizens were all free. Rome fought for the glory of Rome and for the honors associated with military victories.No, they didn't have to. Roman citizens were all free. Rome fought for the glory of Rome and for the honors associated with military victories.No, they didn't have to. Roman citizens were all free. Rome fought for the glory of Rome and for the honors associated with military victories.No, they didn't have to. Roman citizens were all free. Rome fought for the glory of Rome and for the honors associated with military victories.No, they didn't have to. Roman citizens were all free. Rome fought for the glory of Rome and for the honors associated with military victories.
It was when the fall of Rome happened :)
the roman army was weak so it could not defend the empire from barbarians who attacked it in the twilight of Rome (Rome was captured in 476 AD by a barbarian named Odacer)