answersLogoWhite

0

🤝

Roman Empire

The Roman empire spanned throughout Europe and Northern Africa. It stood from 44 BC to 286 AD. The Roman empire witnessed the time of the gladiator as well as a significant shift in religious views.

500 Questions

What did sulla ask of Julius Caesar?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Sulla confiscated Julius Caesar's property, stripped him of his inheritance, his priesthood and his wife's dowry and ordered him to divorce his wife Cornelia. Caesar refused and went into hiding.

How did Julius Caesar get arrested?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

He did not get arrested, in the play by William Shakespeare. Also, in reality, he was never arrested. In fact, in order to prevent getting arrested he started a civil war.

What are two incidents Cassius tells to Brutus What is his purpose in telling them?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Cassius recalls a windy day when he and Caesar stood on the banks of the Tiber River, and Caesar dared him to swim to adistant point. They raced through the water, but Caesar became weak and asked Cassius to save him. Cassius had to drag him from the water. Cassius also recounts an episode when Caesar had a fever in Spain and experienced a seizure. Cassius marvels to think that a man with such a feeble constitution should now stand at the head of the civilized world. Cassius's purpose is to convince Brutus to side against Caesar by how can a weak man have so much power.

In the play tragedy of Julius Caesar who was killed for his name?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Cinna the Poet, who unfortunately had the same name as Cinna the conspirator.

How was the economy under Augustus Caesar?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The economy took a giant step forward under Augustus. Interest rates fell and much of the debt was relieved. There was an influx of cash and businesses were able to expand. There was work, as new and updated infrastructure facilities were built. Trade, especially in exotic goods from the east, flourished.

The economy took a giant step forward under Augustus. Interest rates fell and much of the debt was relieved. There was an influx of cash and businesses were able to expand. There was work, as new and updated infrastructure facilities were built. Trade, especially in exotic goods from the east, flourished.

The economy took a giant step forward under Augustus. Interest rates fell and much of the debt was relieved. There was an influx of cash and businesses were able to expand. There was work, as new and updated infrastructure facilities were built. Trade, especially in exotic goods from the east, flourished.

The economy took a giant step forward under Augustus. Interest rates fell and much of the debt was relieved. There was an influx of cash and businesses were able to expand. There was work, as new and updated infrastructure facilities were built. Trade, especially in exotic goods from the east, flourished.

The economy took a giant step forward under Augustus. Interest rates fell and much of the debt was relieved. There was an influx of cash and businesses were able to expand. There was work, as new and updated infrastructure facilities were built. Trade, especially in exotic goods from the east, flourished.

The economy took a giant step forward under Augustus. Interest rates fell and much of the debt was relieved. There was an influx of cash and businesses were able to expand. There was work, as new and updated infrastructure facilities were built. Trade, especially in exotic goods from the east, flourished.

The economy took a giant step forward under Augustus. Interest rates fell and much of the debt was relieved. There was an influx of cash and businesses were able to expand. There was work, as new and updated infrastructure facilities were built. Trade, especially in exotic goods from the east, flourished.

The economy took a giant step forward under Augustus. Interest rates fell and much of the debt was relieved. There was an influx of cash and businesses were able to expand. There was work, as new and updated infrastructure facilities were built. Trade, especially in exotic goods from the east, flourished.

The economy took a giant step forward under Augustus. Interest rates fell and much of the debt was relieved. There was an influx of cash and businesses were able to expand. There was work, as new and updated infrastructure facilities were built. Trade, especially in exotic goods from the east, flourished.

How did the Romans choose emperors?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.

First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.

First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.

First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.

First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.

First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.

First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.

First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.

First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.

5 What kind of poetry was the roman poet horace famous for?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Horace was a lyric poet and satirist.

What did the conspirators do after they killed Caesar?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

they washed their hands in his blood

Use aqueduct in a sentence?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Since aqueduct is a noun meaning water pipe, you would use it as any other noun. Such as: "The aqueduct is clogged and the water only trickles through." or "The Roman aqueduct is still in use for irrigation".

Roman rule was usually tolerated well because .?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Romans did not force a change in traditions!

Serb leaders wanted the rule order and prestige of the old serbian empire that had what?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The Serb leaders wanted the rule, order, and prestige of the old Serbian empire that had been strong during this period of time.

How did the Severan emperors stay in power?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

=The Severan emperors stayed in power by paying the army well.=

Is egbonia republic?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

no

What was whispered in the ear of victorious roman emperors?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Anything could be whispered in the ear of a victorious Roman emperor if someone could get close enough to him. However if you mean a victorious Roman general (he could also be an emperor) during his triumph, a slave was supposed to hold a crown over the man's head and whisper "remember you are only a man". This was because the Roman triumph was a very serious, sacred occasion with the triumphing general being on a par with the god Jupiter for that day.

Anything could be whispered in the ear of a victorious Roman emperor if someone could get close enough to him. However if you mean a victorious Roman general (he could also be an emperor) during his triumph, a slave was supposed to hold a crown over the man's head and whisper "remember you are only a man". This was because the Roman triumph was a very serious, sacred occasion with the triumphing general being on a par with the god Jupiter for that day.

Anything could be whispered in the ear of a victorious Roman emperor if someone could get close enough to him. However if you mean a victorious Roman general (he could also be an emperor) during his triumph, a slave was supposed to hold a crown over the man's head and whisper "remember you are only a man". This was because the Roman triumph was a very serious, sacred occasion with the triumphing general being on a par with the god Jupiter for that day.

Anything could be whispered in the ear of a victorious Roman emperor if someone could get close enough to him. However if you mean a victorious Roman general (he could also be an emperor) during his triumph, a slave was supposed to hold a crown over the man's head and whisper "remember you are only a man". This was because the Roman triumph was a very serious, sacred occasion with the triumphing general being on a par with the god Jupiter for that day.

Anything could be whispered in the ear of a victorious Roman emperor if someone could get close enough to him. However if you mean a victorious Roman general (he could also be an emperor) during his triumph, a slave was supposed to hold a crown over the man's head and whisper "remember you are only a man". This was because the Roman triumph was a very serious, sacred occasion with the triumphing general being on a par with the god Jupiter for that day.

Anything could be whispered in the ear of a victorious Roman emperor if someone could get close enough to him. However if you mean a victorious Roman general (he could also be an emperor) during his triumph, a slave was supposed to hold a crown over the man's head and whisper "remember you are only a man". This was because the Roman triumph was a very serious, sacred occasion with the triumphing general being on a par with the god Jupiter for that day.

Anything could be whispered in the ear of a victorious Roman emperor if someone could get close enough to him. However if you mean a victorious Roman general (he could also be an emperor) during his triumph, a slave was supposed to hold a crown over the man's head and whisper "remember you are only a man". This was because the Roman triumph was a very serious, sacred occasion with the triumphing general being on a par with the god Jupiter for that day.

Anything could be whispered in the ear of a victorious Roman emperor if someone could get close enough to him. However if you mean a victorious Roman general (he could also be an emperor) during his triumph, a slave was supposed to hold a crown over the man's head and whisper "remember you are only a man". This was because the Roman triumph was a very serious, sacred occasion with the triumphing general being on a par with the god Jupiter for that day.

Anything could be whispered in the ear of a victorious Roman emperor if someone could get close enough to him. However if you mean a victorious Roman general (he could also be an emperor) during his triumph, a slave was supposed to hold a crown over the man's head and whisper "remember you are only a man". This was because the Roman triumph was a very serious, sacred occasion with the triumphing general being on a par with the god Jupiter for that day.

Did roman expansion contribute to the decline of the rebublic?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Yes, it was one of the factors that contributed to the decline of the republic. Along with the acquisition of new territories came new issues that needed addressing. Some of these issues were trade, citizenship, law and defense. Many voting members of the senate in Rome, ignored these concerns and insisted that the government be run the way it had always been run. This attitude split the senate and ultimately led to the downfall of senatorial power and the demise of the republic.

Yes, it was one of the factors that contributed to the decline of the republic. Along with the acquisition of new territories came new issues that needed addressing. Some of these issues were trade, citizenship, law and defense. Many voting members of the senate in Rome, ignored these concerns and insisted that the government be run the way it had always been run. This attitude split the senate and ultimately led to the downfall of senatorial power and the demise of the republic.

Yes, it was one of the factors that contributed to the decline of the republic. Along with the acquisition of new territories came new issues that needed addressing. Some of these issues were trade, citizenship, law and defense. Many voting members of the senate in Rome, ignored these concerns and insisted that the government be run the way it had always been run. This attitude split the senate and ultimately led to the downfall of senatorial power and the demise of the republic.

Yes, it was one of the factors that contributed to the decline of the republic. Along with the acquisition of new territories came new issues that needed addressing. Some of these issues were trade, citizenship, law and defense. Many voting members of the senate in Rome, ignored these concerns and insisted that the government be run the way it had always been run. This attitude split the senate and ultimately led to the downfall of senatorial power and the demise of the republic.

Yes, it was one of the factors that contributed to the decline of the republic. Along with the acquisition of new territories came new issues that needed addressing. Some of these issues were trade, citizenship, law and defense. Many voting members of the senate in Rome, ignored these concerns and insisted that the government be run the way it had always been run. This attitude split the senate and ultimately led to the downfall of senatorial power and the demise of the republic.

Yes, it was one of the factors that contributed to the decline of the republic. Along with the acquisition of new territories came new issues that needed addressing. Some of these issues were trade, citizenship, law and defense. Many voting members of the senate in Rome, ignored these concerns and insisted that the government be run the way it had always been run. This attitude split the senate and ultimately led to the downfall of senatorial power and the demise of the republic.

Yes, it was one of the factors that contributed to the decline of the republic. Along with the acquisition of new territories came new issues that needed addressing. Some of these issues were trade, citizenship, law and defense. Many voting members of the senate in Rome, ignored these concerns and insisted that the government be run the way it had always been run. This attitude split the senate and ultimately led to the downfall of senatorial power and the demise of the republic.

Yes, it was one of the factors that contributed to the decline of the republic. Along with the acquisition of new territories came new issues that needed addressing. Some of these issues were trade, citizenship, law and defense. Many voting members of the senate in Rome, ignored these concerns and insisted that the government be run the way it had always been run. This attitude split the senate and ultimately led to the downfall of senatorial power and the demise of the republic.

Yes, it was one of the factors that contributed to the decline of the republic. Along with the acquisition of new territories came new issues that needed addressing. Some of these issues were trade, citizenship, law and defense. Many voting members of the senate in Rome, ignored these concerns and insisted that the government be run the way it had always been run. This attitude split the senate and ultimately led to the downfall of senatorial power and the demise of the republic.

Are there any similar structures like the Colosseum that are still standing today?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Yes, the Romans built many amphitheatres (arenas). At least 230 of them have been found in the areas which were covered by the Roman Empire. Not all of them are still standing, for many there are just ruins left. 94 of them are in Italy, 35 in France, 34 in Tunisia, 15 in England, 10 in Spain, 5 in Algeria, Bulgaria and Switzerland, ,4 in Libya and in Wales 3 in Austria, Croatia Germany,Israel, Portugal, Romania, and Turkey, 2 in Cyprus, Hungary, Scotland and Syria, and 1 in Albania, Greece , Holland, Lebanon, Morocco and Serbia.

The city of Rome had two amphitheatres. Besides the Colosseum there was the Amphitheatrum Castrense. The second most famous standing Roman amphitheatre is the Arena of Verona, where they hold concerts and opera performances. Other amphitheatres which are still quite intact are in Pula (Croatia), Arles, Frejus, and Nimes (France), Capua (Italy), Tarragona (Spain), El Djem and Oudna (Tunisia).

Why did Rome have multiple forums?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Emperors competed with their predecessors to build the grandest forums In addition, there was a need for multiple fora to serve the Roman population. Remember that a forum was basically a marketplace-- the ancient version of a shopping mall. With Rome's millions of people, there was a need for many fora to provide goods and service.

Why were there not typical roman plays?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Most plays performed in the Roman era were of Greek descent and were considered to be the more cultured type of entertainment.

Most Roman plays that were performed were of a more lewd nature and often referred to political situations of the time.