Want this question answered?
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
Hess checked his hair and noticed it was the same as wegners so it was that their theorys were the same
Alfred Wegner's continental drift theory was ignored because he didn't have enough proof to show everyone that tectonic plates were moving. The supercontinent Pangaea sounded like a big fantasy to everyone back then.
this is easy! I LEARNED IT IN SCIENCE! WERGNER DICOVERED IT. WEGNERS EARLIER THEORY OF CONTINENTAL DRIFT WAS REEXAMMINED AND A NEW THEORY WAS BORN ............................ THE THEORY OF PLATE TECTONICS
His eviendence (and since he didn't have enough) was that he found eviendence on fossils land scape trenches and when he put the continents all together than he saw that the continents fit like a jigsaw puzzle and called it pangea.
The main problem with Wegners theory of continental drift was that at the time he proposed it he had no real proof.
Because wegner didnt have proof to show what caused mountains.
The hypothesis you are looking for is continental drift.
Somewhere in Euroasia....
because he couldn't explain what forces caused the continents to move... :D yup that's why
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
He's middle name is Alfred Lothar Wegner.
puzzle-like fit, climate, and animal traceings:))
you pronounce it like ale_fred _veg_ner I hope this helps you ;D bye
Wegner was the man who established the theory of "continental drift" in 1912
Alfred Wegner's hypothesis about Pangea was that it is one whole big continent.
He discovered Pangaea; once all the continents were together, as one big continent.