answersLogoWhite

0

Most outstanding constitutional monarch in history?

Updated: 8/19/2019
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Best Answer
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Most outstanding constitutional monarch in history?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Who were the four most outstanding colonist in the constitutional convention?

The Constitutional Convention took place from May 14 to September 17, 1787, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, John Rutledge and James Wilson were four of the most outstanding colonist in the constitutional convention.


Who was the most powerful monarch in spanish history?

Phillip II


What was one of the most outstanding soilders in modern history?

Napoleon Bonaparte.


What is a constitutional monarchy?

A constitutional monarchy is a form of constitutional government, where either an elected or hereditary monarch is the head of state, unlike in an absolute monarchy, wherein the king or the queen is the sole source of political power, as he or she is not legally bound by the constitution. The levels and types of power and authority held by the Monarch vary from case to case, as does the nature and guarantees of the constitution, of course. Most constitutional monarchies have a parliamentary system (such as Australia, Belgium, Cambodia, Canada, Denmark, Japan, Malaysia, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, United Kingdom) in which the monarch is the head of state, but a directly or indirectly elected prime minister is head of government. Although most contemporary constitutional monarchies are representative, constitutional democratic monarchies, they have co-existed with fascist and quasi-fascist constitutions (Italy, Spain) and with military dictatorships. There is no implication of shared power implicit in a constitutional monarchy. IN some cases, the constitutional monarch is essentially powerless and a figurehead, in others, the monarch enjoys -almost- unlimited power. The sole distinction in a constitutional monarchy is that the power of the monarch is predicated on constitutional empowerment and limitations.


Can a King of a country vote during elections?

In most constitutional monarchies there is a constitutional bar to the monarch voting. In the UK, the Queen can theoretically vote and she is on the electoral register, but she never votes, to do so would compromise her constitutional position.


Why was Napoleon Bonaparte one of the most outstanding soldiers in modern history?

Yes :] That is true


Which french leader is thought of as the most powerful absolute monarch in french history?

Louis XIV


When was Brazil's best performance in the history of the World Cup?

Most people say the 1970s team was outstanding


One of the most outstanding soldiers in modern history was who?

Napoleon Bodnaparte deserves that accolade.


How does a homeopath prepare for Constitutional prescribing?

The most important aspects of preparation for constitutional prescribing are the taking of a complete patient history and careful patient education.


How does monarchy differ from oligarchy?

A Monarchy has a Monarch or a single ruler ( Or in the case of a Constitutional Monarchy, a Monarch as a sort of figurehead) while Oligarchy involves a snall and elite cadre of people who control most of the wealth of a country. (Russia is a good present example.)


How does the power of an absolute ruler like the Pharaoh of Ancient Egypt differ from that of a constitutional monarch like Queen Elizabeth of Great Brittan?

An absolute ruler has the ability to create, sign off on, and enforce any rule, law, edict, or judgment that he desires. He is not required to listen to anyone's opinion, though he may solicit it and he is not required to follow any laws himself. A constitutional monarch is bound by a constitution, restricting his power as concerns his abilities to create, sign off on, and enforce rules, laws, edicts, and judgments. In the case of Queen Elizabeth I, she had no power to create laws and rules and could only issue edicts or sign off on laws or rules given to her by the legislature. Additionally, because the judiciary was a separate branch she had no direct authority over judgments. The most important difference between a constitutional monarch and an absolute monarch is that the constitutional monarch is bound by the law and can be held accountable for his actions; the absolute monarch is above the law.