0
N McCulloch v. Maryland why did the state of Maryland bring suit against a U.S. branch bank in Baltimore?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
James McCulloch didn't sue the State of Maryland, he appealed a judgment Maryland and a private citizen named John James were awarded against him for non-payment of taxes levied against the Second Bank of the United States, where he was Cashier.
The US Supreme Court accepted the case on appeal and nullified a Maryland law taxing banks not chartered by the State, under the theory that states can't tax the federal government due to the Article VI Supremacy Clause.
Case Citation:
McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThe State of Maryland didn't sue James McCulloch, a private citizen named John James sued as an intervenor for himself and on behalf of the state of Maryland. James had learned McCulloch, Cashier of the Second Bank of the United States, refused to pay taxes levied against the bank as the result of a new law Maryland imposed against banks not chartered by the State. McCulloch refused to pay the taxes because he believed the statute was unconstitutional.
Under Maryland law (at least at the time), anyone who files a civil suit against an entity for non-payment of taxes is entitled to a bounty of half the judgment awarded. John James filed suit in Baltimore County Court and won.
The decision was appealed and affirmed in the state court system, but the US Supreme Court held Maryland's law was unconstitutional because the states can't tax the federal government.
Case Citation:
McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
In McCulloch v. Maryland why did the state of Maryland bring suit against a U.S. branch bank in Baltimore?
This branch bank refused to pay certain taxes levied against the bank
What role did James McCulloch play in McCulloch v. Maryland 1819?
James McCulloch was cashier and head of the Baltimore, Maryland, branch of The Second Bank of the United States who refused to pay a new tax the State of Maryland attempted to impose on the bank. McCulloch was the nominal defendant in Maryland's case against the federal government in the state courts, and the petitioner in the US Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland, (1819).Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)For more information about McCulloch v. Maryland, see Related Links, below.
Why did the state of Maryland bring suit against a U.S. branch bank in Baltimore?
This branch bank refused to pay certain taxes levied against the bank.
Who is James W McCulloch?
Mathew Mcculloch is the guy that had the first wine suck.
Who was sued in McCulloch v Maryland?
James McCulloch, head of the Baltimore Branch of the Second Bank of the United States, was originally sued by John James, a citizen, who took action as an intervenor (a party without a direct interest who has a legitimate stake in the outcome of the case). because he hoped to collect a portion of the proceeds from the Second National Bank's delinquent taxes. He won a judgment in Baltimore County Court. McCulloch was the nominal respondent for the US government.James McCulloch appealed the judgment (sued Maryland and John James) and the validity of the tax itself to the Maryland Court of Appeals, which affirmed the lower state court's decision.The US Supreme Court found in favor of the Second National Bank, however, holding that the Constitution grants implied powers that allow Congress to take actions to help them carry out their constitutional responsibilities, including creating a bank to allow the federal government a means of conducting business.Chief Justice Marshall cautioned that the states had no right to impede valid constitutional exercise, and implied the Maryland law was the equivalent of restraint of trade. Marshall's famous quote from McCulloch is, "The power to tax is the power to destroy."Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, John James, 17 US 316 (1819)McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819) [shorter title]
What is a synopsis of McCulloch v Maryland?
Congress passed an act in 1816 to start the Second Bank of the United States to help control currency in the nation. The Bank opened a branch in Maryland to issue bank notes, carry out transactions, etc. In 1818, Maryland passed an act to tax the Bank. James McCulloch, head of the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank, refused to pay the tax that Maryland had imposed.Maryland filed a lawsuit in court against McCulloch in an attempt to collect the tax. Maryland stated that the Constitution did not allow the federal government to charter a bank, so the Bank was unconstitutional. When the case reached the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Marshall declared that the Bank was constitutional because of the elastic clause and Congress's implied powers. According to the Supreme Court, Congress had the authority to make any law necessary and proper for carrying out its duties, including the right to charter a national bank.In the end, the Supreme Court decided that the federal government had the power to set up a national bank and the states did not have the power to tax the federal government. Marshall's reason was that the power to tax involves the power to destroy. The Mcculloch v. Maryland case was fundamental in establishing (1) the principle of Congress's implied powers and (2) federal government's precedence over state governments.Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)
Where is the Baltimore Branch Library in Baltimore located?
The address of the Baltimore Branch Library is: 205 E. Market St., Baltimore, 43105 1326
What is the phone number of the Baltimore Branch Library in Baltimore?
The phone number of the Baltimore Branch Library is: 740-862-8505.
Who were the major players in the McCulloch v Maryland case?
Chief JusticeJohn Marshall................Federalist PartyAssociate JusticesBushrod Washington.....Federalist PartyWilliam Johnson............Democratic-RepublicanHenry B. Livingston.......Democratic-RepublicanThomas Todd................Democratic-RepublicanGabrielle Duvall.............Democratic-RepublicanJoseph Story.................Democratic-RepublicanCase Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)
What group or government entity benefited most from the decisions in McCulloch v Maryland and Gibbons v Ogden?
Federal government
Where is the Govans Branch in Baltimore located?
The address of the Govans Branch is: 5714 Bellona Ave., Baltimore, 21212 3508
Where is the Hamilton Branch in Baltimore located?
The address of the Hamilton Branch is: 5910 Harford Rd., Baltimore, 21214 1845
