In any peasant community children work in the fields. As families move in from the countryside to work in Britain's developing industrial cities, there is nothing intrinsically strange about children joining their parents in the factories. And the entrepreneurs who own the factories welcome a supply of labour trapped by economic circumstances into accepting long hours and low pay.
The living conditions of the poor in any rapidly growing city, without sanitation, are invariably worse than the condition of peasants in the countryside. But in Britain in the early 19th century it is exploitation within the factories which prompts the first measures of reform.
The first Factory Act, in 1802, introduces a regulation which by later standards seems astonishing. It limits the amount of time which a child may work in a factory to twelve hours a day.
After much opposition the reformers achieve significant improvements in the Factory Act of 1833. Children under nine are now not to work at all. Those aged between nine and thirteen are limited to eight hours of work and must be given two hours of education each day (this is the first small step towards compulsory education in Britain). And an inspectorate is set up for the factories, albeit initially with only four inspectors for the entire country.
The last significant regulation of hours of work is achieved in the Ten Hour Act of 1847, which stipulates that number of hours as the maximum working day for women and children in the nation's factories and textile mills. This act is largely the achievement of Lord Shaftesbury, who is responsible also for the Mines Act of 1842. This makes it illegal for women of any age and for boys under thirteen to be employed underground.
By the mid-century Shaftesbury is much concerned with the condition of London slums, campaigning actively for improvements in housing and public sanitation. In the 20th century environmental pollution comes to be seen as another deficit to be charged against the Industrial Revolution.
Industrialization, with its blend of benefits and drawbacks, spreads gradually round the world from its first manifestation in Britain. When a developing country has an adequate transport system, and the ability to provide the starting costs of industrial enterprises, it can begin to manufacture its own goods, from its own raw materials, rather than buying them from a more advanced economy. In certain industries the cheap labour of a developing economy can soon give a competitive edge in world markets.
Exploitation and slums remain characteristic of the Industrial Revolution anywhere in the world. But gradually, along with the pain and the misery, the average standard of living rises in any nation which takes this familiar path.
insane asylums
ending segregation in schools
John Bull has written: 'More reasons for a reform in Parliament' -- subject(s): Great Britain, Great Britain. Parliament, Reform
George Gordon Andrews has written: 'Parliamentary reform in England, 1830-1832, by George Gordon Andrews ..' -- subject(s): Great Britain, Great Britain. Parliament, History, Politics and government, Reform 'Parliamentary reform in England' -- subject(s): Great Britain, Great Britain. Parliament, Politics and government
The final vote for the healthcare reform is 219-212
Robert M. La Follette was a progressive politician who passed reform measures that became a model for other states.
M. G. Brock has written: 'The Great Reform Act' -- subject(s): Great Britain, Great Britain. Parliament, Politics and government, Reform
17th amendment
PAUL ALEXANDER has written: 'THE ANCIENT WORLD'
strengthened civil rights laws
Carlos Flick has written: 'The Birmingham Political Union and the movements for reform in Britain, 1830-1839' -- subject(s): Birmingham Political Union, Chartism, Elections, Great Britain, Great Britain. Parliament, History, Politics and government, Reform
Robert M. La Follette was a progressive politician who passed reform measures that became a model for other states.