Almost never. FAT16 restricts the possible file name length to only 8 characters, and doesn't support more than 2 GB maximum. FAT32 supports far larger drives and partitions. There is a slight performance overhead, but if the system can't handle the overhead tolerably, it shouldn't be running Windows 98 anyway.
There are almost no instances where it would be appropriate. FAT32 introduces very little overhead compared to FAT16, and enables the use of long file names.
Fat16 and Fat32
FAT16, FAT32, and NTFS.
Windows 98 supports both the FAT16 and FAT32 file systems. The FAT32 file system will support drives up to 2 terabytes in size, while the FAT16 file system will support drives up to 2 gigabytes in size.
Windows 2000 supports FAT16, FAT32, and NTFS partitions.
Windows 98 supports FAT12, FAT16, FAT32, and ISO9660 (on CDs).
Windows 98 can be installed on a FAT16 or FAT32 partition (FAT32 is the best choice for disks larger than 512 MB, and supports long file names better).
no it can also use FAT32 or FAT16
FAT12 for floppy disks FAT16 for Hard Disk FAT32 for Hard Disks VFAT (an overlay for FAT32) that allows long file names
Windows XP only recognizes FAT16, FAT32, and NTFS partitions. If it is not one of these (such as ext3 or ReiserFS), it will report it as an "unknown partition."
Windows NT4 supports: FAT, NTFS (version 4) Windows 2000 supports: FAT, FAT16, FAT32, NTFS (versions 4 and 5)
FAT12, FAT16, or FAT32
FAT, FAT16, FAT32, or NTF2