0
Only part of the enslaved population would be counted when determining representations?
three-fifths
What else can I help you with?
What compromise was only part of the enslaved population would be counted when determining representations?
The compromise you're referring to is known as the Three-Fifths Compromise, which was reached during the Constitutional Convention in 1787. It stated that for the purposes of representation in Congress, enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person. This arrangement aimed to balance the interests of slaveholding states with those of free states, influencing the distribution of political power in the newly formed United States.
Why did some northern delegates argue that enslaved people should be counted for taxation but not representation?
Northern states objected because enslaved people were legally considered property. So, some argued that as property, Slaves should be counted for taxation but not representations.
Under the three fifths compromise each enslaved person was counted as three fifths of a free person fow what purpose?
Under the 3/5ths Compromise, each enslaved person was counted as three fifths of a free person for population reasons. This was especially true when it came to determining taxation and legislative representation for slave holding states.
How did the states resolve the debate over representations for enslaved Americans?
The three fifths compromise. Meaning a slave counted as 3/5ths of a person in order to maintain the slave population limited when voting since there was a vast amount in the south.
When determining population size using direct observation every individual in a population is counted.?
true
How was slaves treated in the constitution?
When determining representation by population, slaves were counted as 3/5ths of a person.
How did the Constitutional Convention resolve the issue of whether or not to count enslaved people when determining states representation in the House Question 8 options?
The Constitutional Convention resolved the issue of counting enslaved people for representation by adopting the Three-Fifths Compromise. This agreement stipulated that enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purposes of determining a state's population and, consequently, its representation in the House of Representatives. This compromise was a crucial factor in gaining support from Southern states, which had large enslaved populations, while also addressing the concerns of Northern states.
What is a good sentence using the word three-fifths compromises?
Three-fifths Compromise is the agreement providing that enslaved people would count as three-fifths of other people in determining representations in Congress.
Agreement that slaves would not be counted as a whole person when determining representation?
The Three-Fifths Compromise if i'm not mistaken. It counted slaves as 3/5 of a person when determining the amount of representatives a state received in congress (based on population)
In determining a state and population for congressional representation Article 1 (1787) of the U.S. Constitution quantified that slaves were counted as?
In determining a state's population for congressional representation, Article 1 of the U.S. Constitution established that slaves were counted as three-fifths of a person. This compromise, known as the Three-Fifths Compromise, was reached to balance the interests of slaveholding states with those advocating for the rights of free individuals. It aimed to address the political power of states with large enslaved populations while acknowledging the moral complexities of slavery.
When determining population size using direct observation every individual in a population is counted?
Yes, in direct observation, every individual in the population is counted to determine the population size accurately. This method requires physically counting or seeing each member of the population. It is usually appropriate for smaller populations or groups that can be easily observed and counted.
How would states like Virginia who had a large slave population want slaves to be counted in the population for determining representation in congress?
The same as every other person.
