This means to have an opinion that is not the same that someone else has. You are on this side, he is on that side of the question.
Justice is an abstraction; it has no opinion about me.
This quote suggests that justice is often perceived based on whether the outcome of a decision aligns with one's own interests or beliefs. It implies that individuals may define justice subjectively, based on how it benefits them, rather than on objective principles of fairness or morality.
the opposing side is whoever was fighting them
Luckily, I have written an editorial before, so I think I can help you. First, make a chart so you can plan it first. You need your main opinion, or what side you're on of your topic. There should be two things that branch out from it; your side's evidence and what the opposing side's evidence would be. You would mostly write about your own side, but if there is a strong opposing side you should mention it anyway. Once all the evidence is gathered and already written in the paper, think up the conclusion. It should be pretty basic, summarizing both sides and a restatment of your opinion.
A dissenting opinion is written when a justice disagrees with the majority opinion (which carries the force of law). If a justice is writing a dissenting opinion, that means he or she voted with the minority group, and wants to explain the reason why he or she disagrees with the official Opinion of the Court. Dissenting opinions may be cited, but are not enforceable.
A Supreme Court justice may choose to write a concurring opinion when he or she agrees with the majority decision, but wants to add perceptions or legal reasoning not addressed, or not addressed to that justice's satisfaction, in the majority opinion (opinion of the Court).
go against what someone else thinks. In persuasive writing the author voices his opinion if you voice the opposing side you rebut or go against what has been said.
Opposing means to be in conflict or disagreement with something or someone, to resist or act against something, or to be on the opposite side of an issue or argument.
A US Supreme Court justice who disagrees with the majority opinion writes a dissenting opinion, explaining why he or she disagrees with the majority.
Taking the middle ground means you have adopted a standpoint or opinion that is midway between two extreme or opposing opinions, objectives or options.Taking the middle ground means you have adopted a standpoint or opinion that is midway between two extreme or opposing opinions, objectives or options.Taking the middle ground means you have adopted a standpoint or opinion that is midway between two extreme or opposing opinions, objectives or options.Taking the middle ground means you have adopted a standpoint or opinion that is midway between two extreme or opposing opinions, objectives or options.
A concurring opinion is written by a justice who agrees with the outcome reached by the majority, but who came to that conclusion in a different way and wants to write about why. A dissenting opinion is written by a justice who disagreed with the majority and wants his disagreement known and explained