No sound scientific statistical data exists to support the statment
Data being manipulated to support a point regardless of the truth.
No valid scientific statistical data exists.
Most likely gassed in concentration camps
The sick/ill were killed, other than that, anyone stood a chance of being killed at anytime. Survival rates for intellectuals were lower, as they lacked relevant skills, but there was no trend that (for example) the strongest were more likely to survive, it was down to luck.
According to the story, he killed hundreds of people, or more likely, thousands of people - not just seven.
Not really. As heinous as terrorism is, it hasn't killed that many people, statistically:You're about 100 times as likely to be killed by a drunk driver than you are to be killed by a terrorist.You're 6 times as likely to be killed by tuberculosis than terrorism. When's the last time you heard of someone dying of tuberculosis?
Most likely not because he killed tons of people mostly Jews.
most likely there were people most likely the ones being killed that would have had resistence towards the genocide as well as people against the goverment or group doing the killing
I was
Genetic drift
Don't know the exact answer to this question, it would depend A LOT on a person's lifestyle. If a person is involved in criminal activity that involves firearms, they have a good chance of being killed by a handgun. If a person engages in drug use and dealing, they too have a pretty good chance. They are likely to have either a lot of drugs on them, or money on them, making them a target for robbery. The average person who doesn't engage in any illegal activities is not very likely to be killed by a handgun.
most likely............if not a felon him/herself