The basic requirements of a contract or an agreement are as below:
1. An offer
2. An acceptance
3. Consideration
If any of these components are absent, the agreement or contract would not form a proper contract. However, consideration may be paid in cash or may be a counter obligation to be performed by the other party to the contract. This obligation may be an act to be performed by the other party or a promise to abstain from doing something.
from wawa(ums kal) :contracts under seal are valid without a consideration or perbaps
The advantages of consideration in a valid contract
No....a promissory note is not valid without a consideration.
An offer is valid only if it is made with an intention of getting the assent of another. when there is no acceptance the contract does not come into existence. For a valid contract there must be consideration which need not be adequate.
They are valid element of a contract they are offer and acceptance, legality consideration capacity terms
Just because a contract contains consideration does not mean it is legal or binding. There are other requirements that must be met.
Offer and Acceptance Consideration Legal relationship Certainty and not vague Completeness of the contract
That something of value is offered - that the offer is accepted - and THAT IT ACTUALLY PASSES HANDS. Without all three condition being met there is NOT a valid contract.
An offer is a component part of a contract. There are three steps in creating a valid contract: the offer, the acceptance of the offer and an exchange of consideration.An offer is a component part of a contract. There are three steps in creating a valid contract: the offer, the acceptance of the offer and an exchange of consideration.An offer is a component part of a contract. There are three steps in creating a valid contract: the offer, the acceptance of the offer and an exchange of consideration.An offer is a component part of a contract. There are three steps in creating a valid contract: the offer, the acceptance of the offer and an exchange of consideration.
No. It is not legally possible to sue on a contract that does not exist because there was no formation thereto. However, there are alternative contract-law theories that impute substitutes for consideration. The most common is the legal theory of promissory estoppel. Where it is proven on its elements, it can facilitate a recovery as to the expected benefit of the purported bargain, even without a valid contract having been formed.
There are 7 ingredients to a valid contract 1. Offer; 2. Acceptance; 3. Consideration 4. Capacity to contract; 5. Intention to Create Legal Relations; 6. Consent 7. Legality
A "detriment" is one criteria used to satisfy the sufficiency of consideration supporting a valid contract.