No.
In the universe energy, matter and go as per quantum. Energy is released in quantum of photon. Electron has a quantum mass. Proton has quantum mass. Both has a quantum charge. Neutron has a quantum mass. Speed of light is a quantum. Big bang is a quantum event essentially occurring at particular mass. It takes a quantum energy for shifting of electrons from one shell to other. In photo-luminescence light energy is released in quantum.
normally it is considered to be the charge on an electron. however quarks come in increments of 1/3 of this charge.
Each electron, positron, and proton has.
Good question! Experiments show that the electron "behaves" as if it is a spinning ball of charge. But be careful...the electron IS NOT a spinning ball of charge. Instead the concept is quantum mechanical and has no actual classical analogy. why we r taking the spin of the electorn is +1/2 or -1/2 is there any relation bet rotational symmetry
OQ# has to do with angular momentum. MQ# has to do with the particle behaving like a little bar magnet, (really just a moving charge -> creating a magnetic field).
In physics, quantum is a discrete natural unit, or packet, of energy, charge, angular momentum, or other physical property.
In the universe energy, matter and go as per quantum. Energy is released in quantum of photon. Electron has a quantum mass. Proton has quantum mass. Both has a quantum charge. Neutron has a quantum mass. Speed of light is a quantum. Big bang is a quantum event essentially occurring at particular mass. It takes a quantum energy for shifting of electrons from one shell to other. In photo-luminescence light energy is released in quantum.
No. A quantum is a small and indivisible unit of SOMETHING, which might be energy, charge, spin, or several other things.
An antiparticle is a subatomic particle corresponding to another particle with the same mass, spin and mean lifetime, but with charge, parity, strangeness and other quantum numbers flipped in sign.
normally it is considered to be the charge on an electron. however quarks come in increments of 1/3 of this charge.
A neutron has no charge. Electron and protons have charges. I'm assuming you are not talking about quantum particles.
Each electron, positron, and proton has.
No. That's 1/2 of the charge on one electron ... the quantum of charge.
Good question! Experiments show that the electron "behaves" as if it is a spinning ball of charge. But be careful...the electron IS NOT a spinning ball of charge. Instead the concept is quantum mechanical and has no actual classical analogy. why we r taking the spin of the electorn is +1/2 or -1/2 is there any relation bet rotational symmetry
I am around ten and I'm a geek with quantum physics. As of right now, the key factors with quantum physics are the equations and it is not an opinion. The second most important factors is logic. We can't see subatomic particles, but we can see it through mathematics. Those are the key aspects of quantum physics. Good Answer geek: The key aspect of quantum physics is quaternions. Quantum physics is four dimensional physics. Prior physics involved two dimensions, mostly complex mathematics z=a + bi, this could be called parallel physics. Quantum physics involves quaternions a four dimensional physics q= a =bi +cj +dk, this is non parallel or non-commutative physics. For example Z1Z2 = Z2Z1 for two dimensional physics, but Q1Q2 does not equal Q2Q1 for quaternion Physics. This quaternion aspect of Quantum physics is THE key. Another aspect of Quantum Physics that is overlooked is the free space impedance z= 375 Ohms. Not much attention is paid to z but it is a quantum constant, z= W/Q where W is the quantum magnetic charge in Webers and Q is the quantum electric charge in Coulombs. W and Q are make up Planck's Constant h=WQ. W= 500 atto Webers and Q=4/3 atto Coulombs. h=zQ^2. z is the "Aether" Maxwell postulated as necessary to transport electromagnetic waves and M&M did not find. The Fine Structure Constant Alpha = 1/2 (e/Q)^2 = 7.2E-3 where 'e' is the electric charge and Q the quantum charge.
its not nealy as straight forward as it sounds. It would take us straight into the quantum world. I'm not sure anyone yet completely knows the answer to that question. but in quantum, can show that certain particles like to be together, and certain types dont.
OQ# has to do with angular momentum. MQ# has to do with the particle behaving like a little bar magnet, (really just a moving charge -> creating a magnetic field).