Simple as:
They don't exist, paranoia or mild mental illness can cause delusions about them but they DO NOT EXIST. Science is about facts not crazy illusions.
The leading scientific hypothesis about ghosts is "Ghosts do not exist."
There is no scientific evidence to support the existence of ghosts, so there is no scientific name for them. Ghosts are often considered to be a paranormal or supernatural phenomenon that is not recognized by the scientific community.
There is currently no scientific evidence to support the existence of ghosts. The phenomenon of ghosts falls under the realm of the supernatural, which is beyond the scope of scientific explanation as it cannot be tested or observed through empirical methods.
No, there is no scientific evidence that directly proves that ghosts exist. It is just folklore.
There is no scientific evidence. Those who believe in ghosts will put forward non-scientific evidence.
techinical no, but they can medium your thoughts thru you if you are sensitive.
There is no scientific evidence to support the existence of ghosts, so it is not possible to determine if they have feelings. Belief in ghosts is largely based on personal beliefs and cultural perspectives.
There are many ghosts at the howard school
There is no scientific proof that ghosts exist but there are thousands of photographs(not to mention audio or video!):)
People who don't believe in ghosts are called skeptics. Skeptics typically demand scientific proof of something before they believe in it. As there is no scientific proof in ghosts, skeptics deem them as being unreal.
Pigs are typically not believed to have thoughts or beliefs about ghosts, as they lack the higher cognitive abilities required for such complex concepts.
There is no scientific evidence proving that ghosts exist.