Servants that could obtain their freedom over a period of time were called freemen.
Whether the person was considered property
Similarities: Both slaves and indentured servants were considered property and could be bought and sold. They were often used as laborers in various industries. Differences: Slaves were owned for life and had no rights or control over their own fate, while indentured servants worked for a set period of time to pay off a debt or obligation and could eventually gain their freedom. Indentured servants also had some legal protections and could eventually become free members of society.
While both indentured servants and plantation slaves were bound to work for someone else, indentured servants typically had contracts specifying a set period of servitude (usually around 4-7 years) after which they could gain their freedom. In contrast, plantation slaves were enslaved for life and had no hope of gaining freedom unless granted by their owner. Additionally, indentured servants may have had slightly better living and working conditions compared to plantation slaves.
They couldn't unless they became a warrior or died
indentured servants worked for a period of time without pay
Indentured servants and slaves were similar in that both groups were bound to perform labor for a specified period of time. However, indentured servants typically agreed to work for a certain number of years in exchange for passage to a new country or other benefits, while slaves were considered property and had no control over their labor or freedom. Indentured servants could eventually gain their freedom after their term of service was completed, while slaves were perpetually owned and considered property with no rights.
An indentured servant could expect to work for a specified period, typically 4-7 years, in exchange for passage to a new land and eventual freedom. After completing their term, they could become independent workers or potentially acquire land of their own. Despite the promise of freedom, many indentured servants faced harsh working conditions and limited freedoms during their servitude.
Indentured servants were contracted to work for a specific period of time in exchange for passage to a new country or other benefits, while slaves were considered property for life. Indentured servants could eventually gain their freedom and sometimes even acquire land or other opportunities, whereas slaves had no such prospects for independence. Additionally, indentured servants typically had legal rights and protections that slaves did not.
People felt that because God gave them freedom, that they could achieve freedom from tyranny.
They could eat turkey.
The indentured servants were bought by their masters. The master saw them not as people, but as animals. The indentured servants could not do much without the permission of there masters.
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a lifelong source of labor, whereas indentured servants typically worked for a set period before gaining their freedom. Slaves were also considered property that could be bought and sold, providing plantation owners with a greater sense of control and power. Additionally, the racial hierarchy of the time made slaves a more socially acceptable form of labor exploitation.