Yes. Taking guns away from law abiding citizens does nothing to improve crime.
This amendment gives people the right to keep and bear arms (weapons, guns specifically.)
The Second Amendment of U.S. Constitution is the right of the citizens to keep and bear arms. There are some limits and regulations on this right.
No Indian was allowed to keep guns and pistols according to this act.
To answer your questions guns are to help make the most normal of citizens to safe when going somewhere or at home it helps to keep crime down. and if it wasn't for guns the world would be so different there is proof that guns have been around since the 1300'S.
Your question asks for an opinion. MY opinion is that some people should, some should not. IF you are a responsible adult that does not break laws, guns are used for recreation and for defense. If you are a criminal or cannot act responsibly with things that cause harm, you should not keep guns, knives, jagged rocks and be kept away from pointy sticks.
If you mean in the UK itself, then no. Handguns of any type are illegal, even in gun clubs. Shotguns are allowed, but they must be licensed and kept in a safe approved by the police.
Certainly. The purpose to to maintain order and keep all students safe from those who would being guns, illegal drugs, and other disruptive or dangerous items to school.
The United States constitution Gives the right of US citizens to keep and bear arms.
When the Confederate Army surrendered, Grant allowed the soldiers to keep their guns and their horses. He knew they would need horses to use on the farm.
Can someone keeo your guns from you
That's like asking "Should a child abuser be allowed to keep custody of their child?"
In many cases, officers were allowed to keep their swords and personal revolvers following the end of the Civil War. However, this was not true in every case and was largely dependent on the decision of the Union commander who was accepting the surrender.