No he could have bought spices and other things
No he could have bought spices and other things
No, because the Spanish ships stole the gold.
no he should not
maybe
maybe
maybe
Although few treasures were found, Spain did profit from the Cortez and Pizarro expedition.
yes he should have if he did a lot people would like him and he didn't he kept it to him self and thats selfish.
Although few treasures were found, Spain did profit from the Cortez and Pizarro expedition.
Whether Mel Fisher should have given his treasure to Spain is a complex issue. Legally, he was entitled to the treasure he discovered from the Spanish galleon Atocha, as it was found in U.S. waters and after years of extensive searching. Ethically, one might argue that sharing a portion with Spain respects historical claims, but ultimately, Fisher's tenacity and investment in the search justified his right to keep the treasure. Thus, the decision hinges on legal ownership versus moral considerations in historical context.
yes, its very helpful to people but no at the same tie he could have bout spices and other popular things with it.
The Spaniards melted down much of the Aztec gold and treasures they found to create coins and other objects. They also sent large quantities of the gold back to Spain to fund the Spanish empire and enrich the Spanish crown. Some of the treasures were kept by conquistadors as well.