Yes,this would be nonrestrictiuve because most pple believe commas come after a long period of sentancess///
Nonrestrictive clauses and phrases are set off by commas. These commas separate additional information that is not necessary for the sentence's meaning but provides extra details.
A comma is typically used after "which" when it introduces a nonrestrictive clause, adding extra information that can be omitted without changing the meaning of the sentence. This type of clause is set off by commas to show that it is not essential to the main clause's meaning.
Extra information in a sentence is called a nonessential or nonrestrictive clause or phrase. This additional information provides further details about a noun or verb but is not necessary for the sentence's meaning. It is typically set off by commas.
Use commas to set off nonrestrictive elements. Do not use commas to set off restrictive elements. A restrictive element defines or limits the meaning of the word it modifies and is therefore essential to the meaning of the sentence.
The non-essential subordinate clause is marked off by two commas, which act as a pair of parentheses. 'My cousin is a doctor' (independent clause). 'My cousin, who lives in Manchester, is a doctor' (non-essential subordinate clause; the information 'who lives in Manchester' is merely descriptive). 'My cousin who lives in Manchester is a doctor' (essential subordinate clause; the information 'who lives in Manchester' distinguishes this cousin from my other cousins who live elsewhere, therefore there are no commas).
Not always: the word "which" requires a comma when used as an indefinite pronoun, in contrast to the incorrect use that was originally in this post: "sentences which require a comma before the word "which" are far less frequent" (not only is that incorrect - that use of the word would take a comma as well - it is an unverifiable assertion). That sentence should have taken the definite "that", as in, "sentences that require..."" In speech, the difference is usually expressed by a difference in intonation. In writing, a restrictiverelative clause is not set off by commas, and that is the preferred subject or object of the clause, although many writers use which and who or whom for such clauses. A nonrestrictive clause is set off within commas, and which, who, or whom, not that, is the relative pronoun to use as the subject or object of the verb of the clause."
Punctuation used in a relative clause includes commas, dashes, or parentheses. These are used to set off the clause from the rest of the sentence or to provide additional information about the noun it is referring to.
Yes, most mild interjections are treated as parenthetical elements and should be set off from the rest of the sentence with a comma or a set of commas. This helps to separate the interjection from the main clause and improve readability.
Commas are used in clauses to separate extra information from the main clause, such as with appositives or nonessential clauses. They can also be used to separate items in a list within a clause. Additionally, commas can set off introductory phrases or clauses at the beginning of a sentence.
comma
The correct punctuation for the sentence "This is, in my opinion, depressing" would be to include commas around the phrase "in my opinion" to set it off as a non-essential clause.
In general, a sentence should have commas to separate items in a list, set off introductory phrases, and separate clauses in a compound sentence. The number of commas needed depends on the structure of the sentence.