they shouldn't because that is no life to live for the animal and it will get lonely.
no
there should be no zoos because in the news it showed that zoo killed animals and rot them by bins
yes
There should not be zoos because animals lose their natural habitat.It is cruel to them as well.If some one says that the zoos should be there hen I'd say that well animals should have as much freedom as people.
no they should be free
we should not actually get rid of zoos even though they are in cages but if we do not keep zoos animals will become extinct and if we make more zoo the populations of animals will become bigger
Zoos ruin animal life. Animals should be free. Now, domestic animals wouldn't survive out in the wild.
Animals that are in zoos don't belong cooped up like they are in zoos. The wildlife preserves are more natural and they are easier for the animals.
Zoos help people see animals that they otherwise wouldn't be able to be see. Some people are against them, but in general Tigers are amazing and beautiful and are definitely the kinds of animals that zoos are created to house. So yes, in my opinion, tigers should be in zoos.
Zoos should not be banned because the animals live longer, can't be killed and people learn about them at the zoo
That is a matter of opinion.
Zoos educate people about wild animals and their care. They also take in and/or rehabilitate animals that have been injured, or care for animals that would not survive in the wild.
Yes because keeping zoos is important for animals to avoid extinction. Zoos help preserve species. Sometimes, zoos keep animals and then release them into the wild when the animal is mature enough. Zoos help save animals' lives. If they are disabled, people can help them.