yes
no they should be free
Zoos ruin animal life. Animals should be free. Now, domestic animals wouldn't survive out in the wild.
No animals should be kept in zoos, they should be free or be release back into their native habitat after rehabilitation.
there should be no zoos because in the news it showed that zoo killed animals and rot them by bins
no it shouldn't because they need too be free
Yes! Because animals need to be free and not stuck or "kept for their safety and hunger". They should be free and live at their own risks.
There should not be zoos because animals lose their natural habitat.It is cruel to them as well.If some one says that the zoos should be there hen I'd say that well animals should have as much freedom as people.
we should not actually get rid of zoos even though they are in cages but if we do not keep zoos animals will become extinct and if we make more zoo the populations of animals will become bigger
Animals that are in zoos don't belong cooped up like they are in zoos. The wildlife preserves are more natural and they are easier for the animals.
Zoos help people see animals that they otherwise wouldn't be able to be see. Some people are against them, but in general Tigers are amazing and beautiful and are definitely the kinds of animals that zoos are created to house. So yes, in my opinion, tigers should be in zoos.
Zoos should not be banned because the animals live longer, can't be killed and people learn about them at the zoo
That is a matter of opinion.