No, some animals have painful deaths when they do that
cause animals differ from humans and they have different abilities and their abilities are based on their medical research
Animals should not be used for drug development or medical research for the following reasons: Animals are killed and kept in captivity for the extent of their lives. A lot of the things tested on animals are never even used. It is expensive to keep animals alive for the sole purpose of testing drugs and other devices on them. Animals and humans are not the same.
No.
humans don't got the right to treat animals like trash
Yes it does. That's why we should not use it for special purposes.
no!
there well there well
Well if you were a medical technician, you should know!
Well it depends on your view. But i think that you shouldn't.
It certainly is acceptable provided that the animals are treated as humanely as possible given the work being done.Consider your options:Using animals nd finding cures that work orJust making a wild stab at a cure and using it keeping tabs on the score of successes and failures among human patientsAlternately consult with diabetics, transplant recipients, people bitten by rabid animals and many other medical problems if they would rather have waited until a cure miraculously fell from the skies.Then again there are all of the OSHA standards based on TLMs based on the toxic effects of materials to animals that have been established to protect workers - perhaps this protection should be ignored.
It should be spelt Phlebotomist. It defines a person that opens veins to extra blood for medical purposes, ir blood test.
You don't. Any medical procedures involving animals should be handled at a vet's office.