fully
That will depend on how the parents' wills are written. The wording will determine whether it is to be given to her estate or whether it should be divided between other beneficiaries of the will.
parents are in every way responsible for their child and they should always be there if the child is in need of their parent.
It can depend on the age of the child.
The question is clear enough, however, allot will depend on the parents. If it becomes known, by speaking with a child's music teacher that the child has a gifted voice, then it would be wise to encourage the child to develop that skill. Later on, when the child is older, such as in the teenage years, allow the child to decide that music is not what the child wants.
The 17-year-old's parents are probably responsible for supporting the 17-year-old (it may depend on the state and the exact circumstances). They are not responsible for supporting the 17-year-old's infant, nor should they be.
because there the parents dauhhh
it depends on the child. if the parent feels they can trust the child, i feel the parents should not have to read their childrens texts.
Both parents should.
Yes of course. Parents are paying for their child's education it is their prerogative to know how their child is doing in school
They can & should when needed. that's their job.
Many times, a child can pick which parent they want to live with around the age of 14. It will depend upon both parents and if the judge doesn't think they should move.
Parents should consider a child's maturity before allowing the child to have social media accounts. The parents should limit the amount of time the child spends on social media. Parents should also keep the lines of communication open with their child so that they can tell if there are any negative influences on the child from social networking.