Most likely no.
cloning should be banned for humans but people pay to have there pets cloned.
I think cloning research shouldn't be regulated because cloning can be harmful to the world. Also cloning can have advantages and some disadvantages.
No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No! No!
Cloning is controlled because of opposition by people of religion. They say that cloning is wrong, and that we should not be tampering with life.
genetic research generally involves cloning, as in cloning unicellular organisms and some animals but cloning humans is not allowed and should not be allowed. in a nut shell genetic research involving cloning should not be practiced in any country because a lot of people disabuse opportunities given to them.
Teach
no person should be cloned
Cloning of animals is legal, but cloning of humans is considered to be a taboo and is not legal.
Cloning is considered a taboo in the sense that no human should have the power to do what "god" does. Cloning happens naturally in nature when identical twins are born, but that is the only situation where it is present.
The limits of cloning sould be enforced by both the Institutional Review Board and the Government
meow