Yes. There is no rational argument to support the denial of a person's rights based on their natural orientation.
Sure. There is no reason to restrict the rights of people on the basis of their sexual orientation.
Because we are all human and no one is better than anybody else.AnswerI believe homosexuals should have equal rights. Otherwise we may as well ask the question, Should black people have equal rights? Of course they should! Everyone should have equal rights regardless of their race, background, creed, gender or sexual orientation.
It is not appropriate for me to speculate on someone's sexual orientation. Personal matters such as someone's sexual orientation should be respected and not assumed or discussed without their consent.
Sarah Palin is heterosexual. She is also a vocal opponent of LGBT rights.
Chris Christie is heterosexual. He is also a vocal opponent of gay rights.
Nancy Pelosi is heterosexual. She is also a strong supporter of LGBT rights.
If he or she is your friend then you should treat them as such. Their sexual orientation should not enter into the matter.
The character of Flapjack is not written with sexual orientation
Nothing is known of her sexual orientation.
Soko's sexual orientation is heterosexual/straight.
The Joker's sexual orientation is not written into his character.
Chuck Norris is heterosexual. He's also a vocal opponent of gay rights.