Technology includes almost everything you come into contact with - clothing, pure water, heat, food, furniture - the list goes on. If you used no technology you'd have to sit naked in a cave or open field eating only what you could dig up with your bare hands or kill by breaking its neck - in eaither case you'd have to enjoy it raw. Night would be kind of difficult if it were freezing (so would you) and daytime would be a bare handed competition with anything that might eat you. Then there's winter - no storing food. Summer - no storing water.
No.
I do think they should have the right because it helps students learn in a more fun way then just sitting and reading a book, everyone has the right to do something, but if a student has the access to technology they should be able to use it to learn.
because he belives that everyone should be able to have the chance to go places and use the technology that's given
Everyone in a supervisory position is responsible for enforcing policy that affects the use of a technology.
As technology has made such a large impact on our lives, there have been many debates about this over the years. A few years ago it was even said that the European Union was going to make internet access a human right. Personally because of what technology has done to the world I think everyone should at least have a chance to have access to it. Whether or not they decide to use it is another question, but everyone deserves the opportunity.
same as everyone else.
its is easier to use.
india should not use the new system of science and technology..
yes I think students should use their personal technolgy
Alot of kids use technology so 2/5 of the world
Ha ha, yes, he does. He is not completely technology disabled. He uses email, twitter, and the internet in general just like everyone else. He does not, however, use it as much as everyone else.
everyone was,Everyone was.Words that end in -one (someone, no one, everyone) are considered singular and take singular verbs.