YES!
Only if they are limiting them for their safety and benefit.
Yes
The government gets its' rights from the people/citizens of that country.
It did
It did
That the government should protect the rights of their citizens.
John Locke believed that citizens have the right to rebel against a tyrannical government if it violates their natural rights to life, liberty, and property. He argued that government exists to protect these rights, and if it fails to do so, citizens have the right to overthrow it.
to get freedom from the government and have rights
A dictatorship is the government where people have no rights.
False. It is crucial for citizens' rights to be considered in government, as a functioning democracy relies on the protection and promotion of these rights. Ensuring that citizens' voices are heard and their rights respected fosters trust in government and promotes social stability and justice. Ignoring citizens' rights can lead to disenfranchisement and unrest.
Follow the government.
The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.