answersLogoWhite

0

Judges are a necessary part of the process in applying and interpreting the Constitution.

If Judges do not use and apply the rules laid down in the Constitution, it means nothing. to do that, a judge must determine how the constitution applies to the specific issues in the case being considered.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the philosophy proposing that judges should strike down the actions of the elected branches only if they clearly violate the literal meaning of the Constitution?

This philosophy is known as judicial restraint or strict constructionism. It argues that judges should limit their interpretation of the Constitution to its text and original intent, intervening in the actions of the elected branches only when there is a clear violation of these principles.


Why did the framers of the Constitution provide that the President and Congress be elected while federal judges are appointed?

it provided the framework for popular sovereignty


How do judges get paid after the constitution is made?

Judges, are paid public servants and are paid salaries.


Do judges follow the constitution?

Yes. Contrary to popular opinion, judges do not make laws.


According to the constitution how are federal judges placed on the bench?

Judges are appointed by the President then confirmed by the Senate in accordance with Article II of the United States Constitution.


Which is an example of how Hamilton's idea were expressed in the constitution?

An example of how Hamilton's ideas were expressed in the Constitution is that federal judges were given lifetime terms.Federal judges were given lifetime terms.


Who has the power to purpose amendments to the Constitution of TX?

The Judges.


Who judges whether or not the constitution has been obeyed?

The supreme court


Don Mashak asks Should the Minnesota Legislature be required to reassert it constitutional duty to discipline State Judges to reduce Government Corruption in Minnesota?

In my opinion, the answer is yes. First, it was unconstitutional for the legistlature to ammend the constitution on a deceptive short title ballot. Second, all the ballots have been lost except for the last two. But it just seems obvious that Power Corrupts and absolutle power corrupts absolutely. Instead of the checks and balances that the constitution originally provide the legislature has delegated the power to discipline judges to the judges. It should seem obvious that this is a scenario that invites abuse and corruption at the expense of the general public. see www.judgeourcourts.com


What is the process of apointement of all the judges of High Court?

The process in which judges are appointed to High Court is called The Appointments Clause in the Constitution.


What is one way that congress had clarified the meaning of the constitution?

Congress doesn't clarify the constitution. They make laws. It is the Supreme Court that uses the constitution to interpret laws. There are judges who believe in strict interpretation of the constitution and they try to follow the constitution written as the founding fathers meant it to be made. Then, there are those who believe that there should be a looser interpretation because 200 years ago there was a different world than today.


What is narrow interpretation?

narrow interpretation is the in between interpretation of the judges of the supreme court. In a narrow interpretation the judges fallow what is on the constitution but also their ideas.