yes. yes because there could be certain emergencies that they could use their cell phones for.
____
Alternatively, I think it would be reasonable to allow the cell phones, but require them to have the ringer turned off, so that they don't disrupt classes. It might even be okay to require them to be turned off, because the school does have a phone number and a way for parents to contact students in an emergency, and most cell phone use in school is not a legitimate emergency. Students could turn the phones on if there were a legitimate emergency.
No, because it will distract them from their work. Besides, if they get in an accident and are badly hurt, they wouldn't be able to call you.
Kids aren't allowed to have their cellphones out at schools because they are considered a big distraction and will be able to be used as a cheating device for math tests because of the calculator build in every phone. It can also distract many other people around you and cause other people soooo distracticted that they wont be able to concintrate on the lesson or the assignment that is being given
Yes. Anyone of any age, who travels at all on their own, should always have a charged cellphone with them in case of emergency. Teenagers, while they definitely should have a phone, should also be limited money-wise in their use of it, unless they pay for their own bills, so they understand the value of money.
so we can communicate with our peers and family incase something sereous happens.
xx MELVIN
not very. ive hit many kids there. parents should acompnay
Linkin Park is a band, not a person. So technically (or should I say biologically?) it can't have kids!
You will have to ask or call the weight watchers team(phone numbers on their website)... Because everyone is different. It depends on your weight and height. But I do know that they would get more because they are still growing kids.
no because this would show kids violent stuff such as killing or sometimes it could show nasty stuff in music videos or in MTV. I also believe that this wouln't be mature for kids under 13.
no because kids need to express themselves or they will feel like they dont belong anywhere which will kill their dreams. our kids are our future and should not be restricted their 1st amendment right!
kids should have a cell phone in the ages 9 through 12.
if there is an emergency at school or somewhere else kids can call or text you
About 12 years old.
yes, why not?
Kids should have a cell phone for protection bottom line. And safe parents would do this for teens especially because you can keep an eye on your child.
no facebook is for collage kids if you child doesnt have a cell phone then they shouldn't have a facebook
-Kids Should Have Cell Phone's Because It Could Be HELP When You Are In A Bad Situation Or ENDANGERED! And Every Kid Ages 9 And Older Should ALL Have Cell Phones!(:
I think that all kids should have a cell phone, but not always for safety reasons. It would be okay to call if there was any danger, but kids need a little time to talk and or text to a friend. I think that all kids should have a cell phone, but not always for safety reasons. It would be okay to call if there was any danger, but kids need a little time to talk and or text to a friend.
Yes, but there should be a monthly limit on how much the phone bill can be. Like 20 dollars or so.
kids should have cell phones because in case pf Emercy or death attack. Also in case of fire or burglary. I think kids should have a cellphone because people be kidnapping. BOTT OM LINE !!!!
AnswerNo - My Kids Got A Phone And Immediately Started To Download Porn. Not A Good Idea.AnswerIf you can set clear rules on cell phone usage then a cell phone will allow you to check where your child is and for them to call you if they are in trouble or need assistance.
a lot! no there is about 10099 kids that have a cell phone