There's no particular reason they should, and off the top of my head I can think of a couple of reasons they shouldn't.
Ribosomes could be compared to school cafeterias, as they both serve as sites where essential components are assembled (proteins in ribosomes, meals in cafeterias) to support the functioning of the school (cell in ribosomes, students in cafeterias). Just as cafeterias produce food, ribosomes produce proteins that are essential for the cell's growth and function.
Yes
To keep items cold. Commercial refrigeration equipment can be used in morgues, hospitals, school cafeterias, restaurants. Any business that needs to store something cold will use one.
Jamie Oliver
junk food should stay in cafeterias because children don't need to worry about their weight it's just make them less self confident. and shouldn't parents and teachers and school administrators be more worried about the education of the children? and if they are so concerned about it then pack the child's lunch and don't give them money to buy the junk food.
Yes because it is a particular school.
According to the article, middle school students should still have a bedtime.
100! Everyone should be friends!
yes they should
Opinions about serving food in school cafeterias will vary. Here are some opinions: No, there are still too many uncertainties about health effects of GMO foods for them to be served to children and teens.
They should
it should be a school sport because the kids that like baseball can play for the school