If you are referring to military training alone, no. If you trained all citizens to be soldiers and most of those citizens went on to civilian jobs, those civilians would most likely take away from the training that a person that will actually become a soldier needs. If you are referring to military service being made compulsory, I still say no under the current circumstances. By soldiers volunteering, you are getting recruits that want to be soldiers, meaning that they will take training more seriously and also be more willing to put their life on the line for the mission. If you require military service, you will be recruiting soldiers that do not want to die or fight, and that could be a liability. Sure, in a war like World War 2 where we were threatened by a nation that could have actually taken us over, there is strength in numbers. But in the battles we fight today, where their is no threat of invasion, where we only fight insurgents that try to kill as many soldiers as possible, with no real hope of taking over america, then there is only strength in well trained soldiers. Larger numbers would only mean a higher amount of people that could be hit IED's or ambushes, and result in a high casualty count. Our miltary is now smaller but better trained, but most of the people actually want to serve, which makes their service that much more great.
yes and no there can be a widely spread and inspiring debate with this as there are disadvantages and advantages
A military force made up of civilians trained as soldiers is generally referred to as a paramilitary force. These forces are typically under the command and control of a government or organization and play a role in supporting military operations or maintaining internal security. They receive military training and may have a similar structure and capabilities as regular armed forces, but their members are not professional soldiers.
Compulsory school attendance laws are enacted by the individuals states. All states have such laws, and most states enacted these laws in the late 1800s to early 1900sMassachusetts was the first state to enact compulsory school attendance laws in 1852, and Alaska was the last "state" in 1929.It should be noted that compulsory school attendance laws were enacted while many of the states were still territories (i.e. before they gained actual statehood).
Compulsory education is a requirement under law that children be provided be educated for some period of time. There is a link below to an article on compulsory education.
Rome's determination, its military and its political acumen made it a powerful and long lasting empire.Rome's determination, its military and its political acumen made it a powerful and long lasting empire.Rome's determination, its military and its political acumen made it a powerful and long lasting empire.Rome's determination, its military and its political acumen made it a powerful and long lasting empire.Rome's determination, its military and its political acumen made it a powerful and long lasting empire.Rome's determination, its military and its political acumen made it a powerful and long lasting empire.Rome's determination, its military and its political acumen made it a powerful and long lasting empire.Rome's determination, its military and its political acumen made it a powerful and long lasting empire.Rome's determination, its military and its political acumen made it a powerful and long lasting empire.
It has already been made compulsory in Tamilnadu
It could be beneficial to include psychology as a compulsory subject in school curriculums to help students better understand human behavior, emotions, and mental health. This knowledge can promote empathy, self-awareness, and enhance interpersonal relationships. However, implementation would depend on curriculum requirements and priorities.
co circular activities should made compulsory because they keeps your mind fresh and healthy
It is true that insurance is able to curtail inflation, however, whether or not that means it should be made compulsory is a matter of personal opinion. Many economists believe it should be compulsory.
Speaking of English should not be made compulsory. It should be just like any other language where only those willing to learn use it.
yes, graduation should be the minimum qualification for the politicians
yes.
When they are financially able or not physically capable of working.
yes and no there can be a widely spread and inspiring debate with this as there are disadvantages and advantages
No. Vaccinations are not compulsory in most places.
I think in the month of ramdan Prophet Muhammad made zakat compulsory.
Hajj was made compulsory on 9th AH(631 AD)