Want this question answered?
yesAnswerYes, they are the only ones that have rights to the child's medical treatment unless they are a ward of the state.
the parents did not want to question the doctors. They believed that the doctors were correct on their theories of ALD
If the person that received the treatment was an adult at the time of the treatment being initiated then the onus is on him/her to pay for it. the parents have no responsibility in the matter.
the parents did not want to question the doctors. They believed that the doctors were correct on their theories of ALD
No, she never had any children of her own. She volunteered to feed impoverished children and came across a mother with newborn twins. One of the twins was sickly, but the parents could not afford medical treatment. They allowed Lois Marshall to take him into her home, where she sought medical care for him, but he died when he was 4 years old.
If she doesn't have sole custody, no she can't. And both parents have to sign for a passport, if that helps.
Technicians are not legally allowed to give medical advice but they can relay information from the pharmacist.
If the student is over 18, they are an adult; therefore, if they received medical treatment, they are legally responsible for the bill. The fact that they are a dependant doesn't matter.
No kids should not be allowed to divorce parents
Emergency treatment is always allowed. If they can not get a hold of the parents other relatives can due with the courts consent. Otherwise the court decides.
Parents are told just to treat the symptom of a cold or flu & make their children comfortable because the infections are caused by viruses. There are no treatments for it.
No - except in cases where there is no cure for their condition and a new experimental treatment has shown promise and the parents elect to see if the experimental procedure might help. In that respect the child is part of medical research.