It may depend on the circumstances but as a GENERAL RULE they may seize evidence or contraband that is in plain view.
That is covered by the Fourth Amendment.
Yes and no. If the Police have a search warrant or your consent, they may search you. If they have neither and you're not under arrest, then no. This would be a 4th amendment violation and any evidence obtained through the illegal search would be suppressed. They may only search you incident to arrest, which means after they've verbally informed you that you're under arrest.
Before the police can obtain a search warrant, they must demonstrate probable cause to a judge. This means they must provide sufficient evidence to show that it is likely that a crime has been committed and that the search will uncover evidence related to that crime.
The jail should book you on the warrant and complete the return of service to clear the warrant. You will have to answer the new warrant before release.
A first instance warrant is a legal document issued by a court that authorizes law enforcement to take specific actions, such as arresting an individual or searching a premises, based on initial evidence presented. It is typically issued at the beginning of a legal proceeding, allowing authorities to act before a full trial or hearing takes place. This type of warrant is crucial for ensuring that law enforcement can respond promptly to potential crimes or threats.
No, not unless the error was found and corrected by the issuing judge or magistrate BEFORE the warrant was executed. If the warrant was served at the wrong address, anything found and seized could be excluded as evidence.
If any evidence is acquired without a proper warrant for search and seizure, the evidence must be thrown out before court and the jury cannot use the evidence against the accused in a court case.
An officer of the law can only search for evidence if they have reasonable cause in doing so. All persons do however have the right to see a warrant before allowing a search, which is their right. All officers are aware of this, however, and if asked will produce a warrant. Without this warrant the evidence may be inadmissible in the court of law.Law Enforcement does not have to show you the warrantprior to serving it, or arresting you. Simply the knowledge that the warrant exists is sufficient for them to conduct their activity.They must, however, leave a copy of a search warrant at the residence, if it was a search warrant for a home, and an inventory of things taken, if any.
In order to search through someone's home, police officers must aqquire a search warrant, which is just a slip or piece of paper signed by a judge that gives them legal rights to go searching through a person's home. They also must have some sort of evidence on why they are to search someone's home, such as drugs, leads, etc.
To obtain a search warrant an officer must go before a judge and explain the reason for the search. The warrant will list the reason or reasons why they are searching, what they are looking for, and why. please refer to this link for more information, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_warrant
No knock warrants are something that the Supreme Court has approved in limited situations where it is determined for officer safety, and/or preservation of the evidence that the officer does not have to first knock and announce his presence before serving a warrant.
They must provide a judge with probable cause to do a search.