No, public sector should not be privatised because it was owned by the people.
Generally the private sector is more efficient because efficiency means lower cost and more profit. The public sector doesn't have to worry about profit so there is no incentive to be efficient.
No, politicians can not be privatized. When something is privatized, it means that an organization has gone from the public sector to the private sector. It can also refer to government outsourcing.
yes it should
to promote efficiency. this is because, one common problem facing the public sector is bad attitude towards work. in that respect, if the sector is privatised, the new management would instill a strict routine check on the workers thereby increasing efficiency.
Because normative analysis inherently deals with 'what should be'. Public sector activities are politically-motivated and chosen, so they reflect what the public believes 'what should be'.
public sector
Several public sector undertakings (PSUs) in India have been privatized over the years. Notable examples include Bharat Aluminium Company (BALCO) in 2001, Hindustan Zinc Limited in 2002, and the sale of a majority stake in Air India in 2021. The privatization of these PSUs aimed to enhance efficiency, improve financial performance, and increase competitiveness in the market.
A sector in which the public can budget
They're usually safer than public schools but they're not necessarily better.
the public sector necessity
The difference between public sector and private sector is that when you're in the public sector you work for the government whereas private sector is not. Same applies to accounting.
ea